Aquaculture and the Future: Why Fisheries Economists Should Care
By James L. Anderson. Marine Resource Economics, 2002
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3423505ff5ad63a685db2ec5eee4cdbe26ce641e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- The Economics of Territorial Use Rights Fisheries, or TURFs (2012, background): “Libecap, Arnason, and Anderson (2011) argue that there are efficiency and political economy reasons to allocate rights for fisheries on scales and in amounts that coincide with existing uses (i.”
- Evolving Context and Maturing Science: Aquaculture-Based Enhancement and Restoration Enter the Marine Fisheries Management Toolbox (2013, background): “More recently, the emergence of such intermediate systems, including aquaculture-based fisheries enhancements, has been observed and recognized in the marine realm (Anderson, 2002; Klinger et al., 2012).”
- Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: A cross-country analysis (2016, background): “Aquaculture has also experienced tremendous productivity growth in the last couple of decades, which has contributed to reduced production costs and lower prices for consumers (Anderson, 2002; Asche, 2008; Asche et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2010).”
- Shellfish aquaculture — In praise of sustainable economies and environments (2003, background): “This growth is primarily due to aquaculture (Anderson 2002).”
- Fish farmers and regulators coping with the wickedness of aquaculture (2017, background): “Technological innovations, diseases, prices of production factors, fish market prices and market access are important determinants of profitability and growth (Anderson, 2002; Asche, 2008; Bostock et al., 2010; Guttormsen, Myrland, & Tveteras, 2011; Kobayashi et al., 2015; Kumar & Engle, 2016).”
- The development of large scale aquaculture production: A comparison of the supply chains for chicken and salmon (2016, background): “An important part of this process has been the transfer or adoption of technologies and knowledge from the agricultural sciences (Anderson, 2002; Asche, 2008; Kumar and Engle, 2016).”
- Technological Advances that Led to Growth of Shrimp, Salmon, and Tilapia Farming (2016, background): “Control over the production process has been identified as a driving factor for aquaculture development (Anderson, 2002; Asche, 2008).”
- U.S. seafood consumption (2019, background): “It may also be important to note that it is far from obvious that there is a clear distinction between wild and aquaculture but that the real question is a matter of control with the production process (Anderson, 2002).”
- The Cost of Lice: Quantifying the Impacts of Parasitic Sea Lice on Farmed Salmon (2017, background): “This has been possible due to the ability of aquaculture technologies to control the production process, leading to rapid innovation, lower production costs, and increased product diversity and trade (Anderson 2002; Asche 2008; Roll 2013; Asche et al. 2015; Asche, Roll, and Tveteras 2016).”
- Interactions between aquaculture and fisheries (2013, background): “Anderson [8] pointed out that there is a tendency of fisheries to become closer”
- Fish Price Volatility (2014, background): “Volatility also depends on the characteristics of the production technology, and the FAO statement indicates that aquaculture is a more volatile production technology than fisheries despite its higher degree of control in the production process (Asche 2008; Anderson 2002).”
- Future challenges for the maturing Norwegian salmon aquaculture industry: An analysis of total factor productivity change from 1996 to 2008 (2013, unknown): “The main factor causing this development is widely recognized to be that control with the biological production process has led to a tremendous growth in productivity (Anderson, 2002; Asche, 2008; Smith et al., 2010).”
- Competition between farmed and wild salmon: the Japanese salmon market (2005, background): “…product to a large market segment for a similar wild species (e.g., in Europe, the salmon consumption was very low before farmed salmon became available).9 Hence, the results are of interest, as aquaculture is expected to be the main source for further growth in seafood production (Anderson, 2002).”