Public values and public failure in US science policy

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science (2007, background): “…political interest groups (whether they be disease lobbies or pharmaceutical corporations) on the supply of science will yield outcomes that are broadly beneficial to society; they may, on the contrary, lead to the preferential capture of benefits by certain groups (Bozeman and Sarewitz, 2005).”
Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation (2011, methodology): “The PVM criteria themselves (Table 2, adapted from Bozeman 2007 and Bozeman and Sarewitz 2005) are not, then, actual public values but, rather, a set of diagnostics applicable to questions of science policy (see Bozeman and Sarewitz 2005) T ab le 2 P u b li c fa il u re an d p u b li c p o li cy :…”