Spatiotemporal evolution of China's railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach (vol 43, pg 765, 2009)

By Jiaoe Wang, Fengjun Jin, Huihui Mo, Fahui Wang. 2009

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34084dfc0c997aa5426536db895a6de026fa076a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. L. Beauguitte
2. Cesar Ducruet
3. Becky P. Y. Loo
4. R. Vickerman

In Transportation

1. L. Beauguitte
2. Cesar Ducruet
3. Becky P. Y. Loo
4. R. Vickerman
5. Jerry Olsson

Citations in the corpus

• Spatial Science and Network Science: Review and Outcomes of a Complex Relationship (2014, methodology): “3 2006), but they are still used nowadays to describe the evolution of one given network (Scott et al., 2005; Bretagnolle, 2009; Xie and Levinson, 2007, 2009; Wang et al., 2009).”
• High-speed rail networks, economic integration and regional specialisation in China and Europe (2015, background): “With a total length of 968 km, the line covers three provinces (Guangdong, Hunan and Hubei) and links a number of large cities in central China.”
• Impacts on accessibility of China’s present and future HSR network (2014, unknown): “In other words, in Scenarios 2 and 3 according to the WATT and DA indicators, Zhengzhou is the most accessible city, and is the geometric center of China’s railway network (Wang et al., 2009) and of its urban system (Ye et al.”