Prejudice: its social psychology
By J. Duckitt. 2014
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33f8044a38661f6fb67c0e24a8878fa9b90341ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Romei
- Agnieszka Golec de Zavala
- A. Cichocka
- Claudia Wagner
- Salvatore Ruggieri
- Eduardo Graells-Garrido
- David García
- G. Carrus
Citations in the corpus
- Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Wikipedia (2016, background): “However, it is also well known from social psychology that human-beings generally favor people in their in-group over people in their out-group [9, 34] and our results show that Wikipedia editors reveal a linguistic in-group/out-group bias [23].”
- Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland (2012, background): “Anti-Semitism (α = .91, M = 2.51, SD = 1.19) was measured as a “prejudice syndrome” (Brown, 2010) combining negative emotions, evaluations and hostile behavioral intention toward Jews (cf. Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010).”
- Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves (2017, background): “Similar to findings on racial prejudice (Brown 1995), one study found that people rated computer agents with a face of the same ethnicity as them to be more attractive, trustworthy, persuasive, and intelligent than agents of another ethnicity (Nass & Moon 2000).”
- ETHNIC DIVERSITY, PUBLIC SPENDING, AND INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT FOR THE WELFARE STATE: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE (2013, unknown): “We focus on experiments in economics and leave aside the much older and larger literature in social psychology on the effects that group affiliation in general and race and ethnicity in particular have on individual behaviour (see, e.g. Brown, 2000, 2010).”
- Mindfulness, Pro-environmental Behavior, and Belief in Climate Change: The Mediating Role of Social Dominance (2018, background): “…be considered in terms of individual differences like in the present study, can also vary with contextual features and different types of interventions (e.g., Baas et al., 2014; R. Brown, 2011; Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015; Guimond, Dambrun, Michinov, & Duarte, 2003; Morrison, Fast, & Ybarra, 2009).”
- Foreign Language Exposure, Cultural Threat, and Opposition to Immigration (2012, unknown): “Using a direct measure of interpersonal contact also allows us to better engage with and add to the existing research on intergroup contact (Allport, 1954; Brown, 1995), which argues that positive contact with outgroup members undermines negative stereotypes and leads to positive outgroup evaluation”
- A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013, background): “These negative attitudes are produced by social distance, negative stereotypes, and negative feelings, all of which reinforce one another (Brown, 2010). Social distance means scarce familiarity with the members of the protected group, either voluntary or as the effect of segregation (e.g., by reside”