A strategic taxonomy of biological communication

By P. Hurd, M. Enquist. 2005

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Androgen-dependent male vocal performance influences female preference in Neotropical singing mice (2011, unknown): “…can result in signals that convey information about signaller condition (Maynard Smith & Harper 1995; Vehrencamp 2000; Fitch & Hauser 2003; Hurd & Enquist 2005; Taylor & Reby 2010), and receiver responses to such signals can generate substantial intra- and intersexual selection (Andersson…”
Chemosensory assessment of rival competitive ability and scent-mark function in a lizard, Podarcis hispanica (2007, background): “…provide simultaneous and inextricable information about associated costs and benefits fit into existing theoretical models concerning territory establishment (e.g. Stamps & Krishnan 2001) and honesty and deception in animal communication systems (e.g. Hurd & Enquist 2005; Searcy & Nowicki 2005).”
Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds (2009, background): “Strategic signals, those available to all signallers, may be either ‘classic handicaps’ or ‘conventional signals’ (Hurd & Enquist 2005).”