National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development

By J. Fagerberg, Martin Srholec. 2008

816 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33c690366b07003e603ec1abeb60b628ea0407e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Social innovation in emerging economies: A National Systems of Innovation based approach (2017, background): “Scholars have also pointed at problems with the existing NSI studies, classifying them as being rather descriptive and general in nature (Lorentzen, 2009), and mostly focussing on developed economies with well-established institutional infrastructures in place (Fagerberg & Srholec, 2008).”
Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda (2017, neutral): “…regional diversi ﬁ cation literature opens up possibilities to connect to the international catch-up literature that focuses on the role of technological and social capabilities in countries to catch up and decrease the distance to the technology frontier (Fagerberg & Srholec, 2008; Lall, 1992).”
Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalization: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda (2010, neutral): “JEL Classification: F23, O14, O19”
The Creation and Diffusion of Innovation in Developing Countries : A Systematic Literature Review (2016, neutral): “A similar conclusion is supported by Fagerberg and Srholec (2008), when they analyse the causes behind the weakness of innovation system in developing countries.”
The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity (2013, neutral): “imitation capability (Fagerberg and Srholec, 2008).”
Global investments and regional development trajectories: the missing links (2016, background): “extensively associated to economic development and growth (e.g. Baldwin, 2006; Fagerberg and Srholec, 2008), it is the simultaneous exposure to inflows and outflows (bi-directionality) in places – like most of the European Union –”
Innovation and Economic Development (2009, methodology): “Source: Fagerberg and Srholec (2008) As is evident from the graph there is very close correlation between the “innovation system variable” and economic development as reflect d in GDP per capita.”
The dynamics of national innovation systems: a panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity (2011, background): “A better and more efficient governance system tends to increase the country’s commitment to technological upgrading as well as its imitation capability (Fagerberg and Srholec, 2008).”
The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation (2014, background): “For this reason, innovation has been the subject of several studies linking it to economic growth (Jaffe and Trajtenberg, 2005; Fagerberg and Srholec, 2008; Freeman, 2002; Thoenig and Verdier, 2003).”
Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development (2018, methodology): “…countries do not benefit economically from participating in GVCs.17 Nevertheless, the results presented here confirm, in line with other research (Fagerberg and Srholec 2008, 2017), that there is a strong link between developing technological and social capability and economic development.”
Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice (2014, background): “In national economies innovation is often measured by R&D expenditures and patents, while innovation systems, along with governance, are important factors for economic development (Fagerberg and Srholec 2008).”