Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches

By S. Petit, Atte Moilanen, Ilkka Hanski, M. Baguette. 2001

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33b078e7a86689cf63eeadde8c95004681ed6950

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Evolution of sex-biased dispersal: The role of sex-specific dispersal costs, demographic stochasticity, and inbreeding (2008, background): “Also for species with non-overlapping generations, like insects, there are (to our knowledge) only few published results supporting an asymmetry in dispersal costs (Petit et al. 2001; Matter 2006; Rabasa et al. 2007).”
Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area (2003, background): “Some so-called sedentary species have been shown subsequently to be able to disperse several kilometres (Brunzel & Reich, 1996; Nève et al., 1996; Mousson et al., 1999; Petit et al., 2001).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “…retain fewer immigrants whilst larger ones capture and maintain more (e.g. Hill et al. 1996; Kuussaari et al. 1996; Shreeve et al. 1996; Sutcliffe et al. 1997a; Kéry et al. 2001; Petit et al. 2001; Wahlberg et al. 2002a, b; Ovaskainen 2004; Hovestadt and Poethke 2006; Schtickzelle et al. 2006).”
Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius (2004, background): “Many studies of butterflies have observed lower return probabilities of females than of males (Scott, 1986; Sculley & Boggs, 1996; Brommer & Fred, 1999; Gutiérrez & Thomas, 2000; Roland et al., 2000), but Petit et al. (2001) found higher mortality in males than in females within habitat patches.”
Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes (2003, methodology): “In addition, this model is biologically justified for univoltine butterfly species showing explosive reproduction and patrolling mate-locating behaviour, such as B. aquilonaris and P. eunomia ( Petit et al . 2001; Schtickzelle, Le Boulenge & Baguette 2002).”
The evolution of density‐dependent dispersal in a noisy spatial population model (2006, background): “While it is notoriously difficult to measure dispersal mortality, Hanski et al. (Hanski et al. 2000, Petit et al. 2001) were able to derive the dispersal mortality of two butterfly species by analyzing mark release recapture data with the virtual migration model (Hanski et al. 2000).”
The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisal (2004, background): “…CMT (particularly regarding the high rate of local population turnover and the ‘‘quasi-equilibrium’’ state of the metapopulation) and (3) CMT, SPOMs and derived concepts should not be presented as the only framework for the conservation of populations confronted with habitat loss and fragmentation.”
Population history and life history influence the migration rate of female Glanville fritillary butterflies (2002, background): “Thomas and Singer (1987) inferred elevated emigration rate of Euphydryas editha females from habitat patches with no preferred host plant, and they observed that females that colonized a previously empty habitat patch (following catastrophic extinction) had a biased preference in comparison with fem”
Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS (2004, background): “The Prés de la Lienne patchy population, with frequent adult movements (Petit et al. 2001), is therefore suitable.”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “Sex-bias has been reported in dispersal of some invertebrates, many displaying female-biased dispersal (Kuussaari et al., 1996; Albrectsen & Nachman, 2001; Petit et al., 2001) and others, male-biased (Lawrence, 1988).”
Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape (2003, background): “There are no suitable habitat patches in the neighbourhood (Petit et al. 2001).”
SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY (2002, methodology): “Several studies using this model (Hanski et al. 2000, Petit et al. 2001; N. Wahlberg, unpublished manuscript) have found that typical values for b and c are between 0.1 and 0.5 for butterflies.”
Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population (2002, background): “Marked individuals mix at random in the population: high levels of movements in the area occupied by the population (Petit et al. 2001), associated with the fact that all the area was sampled each time, ensure the mixing of marked and unmarked individuals in the population.”