The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisal
By M. Baguette. 2004
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6572f83fd01c9f731fc7efa650ac00f4b6fce5f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Ilkka Hanski
- N. Schtickzelle
- Gus Mills
- P. Peres‐Neto
- C. Patrick Doncaster
- H. Resit Akçakaya
- Thomas R. Quinn
- Robert D. Holt
In Genetics
- H. Wagner
- Gus Mills
- P. Peres‐Neto
- H. Resit Akçakaya
- Thomas R. Quinn
- Robert D. Holt
- R. Chandler
- Ilkka Hanski
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- N. Schtickzelle
- Ilkka Hanski
- H. Wagner
- P. Peres‐Neto
- Bailey Jacobson
- Robert D. Holt
- Gus Mills
- C. Patrick Doncaster
Citations in the corpus
- Metapopulation theory, its use and misuse (2004, methodology): “ Baguette (2004) makes statements about geographically peripheral and central populations that do not make much sense to me. He gives the impression that many of the metapopulations listed in his Table 2 and to which SPOMs have been applied are peripheral populations that ‘are sustained by the infl”
- Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: Survival, dispersal and the impact of climate (2010, background): “Consequently, identifying whether a patchily distributed population displays the stochastic extinction–recolonization dynamics required by a metapopulation (sensu stricto) remains problematical (Harrison, 1991, 1994; McCullough, 1996; Baguette, 2004).”
- Spatial occupancy models for predicting metapopulation dynamics and viability following reintroduction (2015, background): “Despite the enormous potential of spatially explicit metapopulation models for predicting dynamics and viability, there are several challenges to fitting these models that have prevented widespread application (Baguette 2004).”
- Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal (2014, background): “Although the metapopulation concept sensu stricto may not apply to all species (Baguette 2004, Driscoll et al. 2010, Fronhofer et al. 2012), many habitats are indeed fragmented and, as a consequence, populations of species in those habitats are spatially structured and form metapopulations sensu…”
- A metapopulation perspective for salmon and other anadromous fish (2007, background): “First, many types of metapopulations can exist without substantial and rapid population turnover (extinctions/recolonizations) (Kritzer and Sale 2004) or without a fraction of the suitable habitats being vacant (see below) (Baguette 2004).”
- A brief guide to Landscape Genetics (2006, background): “Classical metapopulation studies are spatially implicit, they view the natural world as divided into cheerful islands (patches) and hostile sea (matrix) (Baquette 2004).”
- The role of metapopulations in conservation (2007, background): “There is little evidence to suggest that metapopulations of any species are in fact at equilibrium ( Baguette 2004 ), and small, highly variable metapopulations are particularly unlikely to be so. However, metapopulations that persist over long timescales must be under some form of density regulatio”
- Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? (2010, background): “species populations within internally homogeneous habitat patches embedded in an unsuitable homogeneous matrix (Baguette 2004; Leibold et al. 2004),”