Global bioenergy potentials through 2050
By Günther W. Fischer, Leo Schrattenholzer. 2001
370 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/339da868a300b078326cad522f10213a45d0d198
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- I. Lewandowski
- André P. C. Faaij
- S. Searle
- Chris Malins
- David Zilberman
- Deepak Rajagopal
- Edward Smeets
- Wim Turkenburg
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- David Zilberman
- S. Searle
- Chris Malins
- Deepak Rajagopal
- Stephan Spiecker
- André P. C. Faaij
- I. Lewandowski
- Edward Smeets
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- David Zilberman
- Felix Creutzig
- S. Searle
- Chris Malins
- Deepak Rajagopal
- Pete Smith
- André P. C. Faaij
- I. Lewandowski
Citations in the corpus
- A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050 (2015, methodology): “We reassess the modeled amount of biomass that can be produced on marginal land and report a revised Fischer & Schrattenholzer (2001) 147–207 0.28 1.32–1.70 0.78 0.82 N/A 45–49 Yamamoto et al. 2001 110 2.33 0.57 0.78 0.71 N/A 81 Wolf et al. (2003) 0–648 0.13–2.51 1.03–1.88 0.78 0.73 1.06 75–111…”
- Potential and cost of electricity generation from human and animal waste in Spain (2010, background): “Examples of this kind of studies are: Hoogwijk [5] and Fischer and Schrattenholzer [6], who estimate the energy potential of animal and organic residues worldwide; Siemons et al.”
- A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 (2007, methodology): “This yield level is in line with the global average yield level of biomass from forestry of 30–38GJha 1 yr (1), estimated by Fischer and Schrattenholzer [13], but is substantially higher than the present global average harvest intensity, which is estimated at 0.”
- Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “The group of optimistic estimates start at around 350 EJ yr−1 (Cornelissen et al 2012, Fischer and Schrattenholzer 2001, Smeets et al 2007).”
- Renewable Energy Futures: Targets, Scenarios, and Pathways (2007, background): “Fisher and Schrattenholzer (113) give a range of 375 EJ to 450 EJ.”
- Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach (2004, background): “1 Fischer and Schratten-Holzer [10] (2050) W.”
- The limits of bioenergy for mitigating global life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels (2017, background): “Early work focused on estimating the land area available for cultivation and future biomass productivity, finding that many hundreds of exajoules of primary bioenergy are potentially available annually [16,17].”
- Economic transition and urban land expansion in Provincial China (2014, background): “…by reducing production costs, increasing the effective market supply of land, promoting intensive land use, or improving output efficiency, all of which would ultimately accelerate regional land use change (Fischer & Schrattenholzer, 2001; Rounsevell, Ewert, Reginster, Leemans, & Carter, 2005).”
- The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis (2014, background): “In literature, different types of potential are distinguished (Fischer and Schrattenholzer, 2001).”
- Review of Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels (2007, methodology): “However, oil prices are uncertain with respect to time, while policies vary both with time and also from region to region (Fischer and Schrattenholzer 2001).”
- Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: the global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030 (2012, background): “Numerous studies have investigated the potential of bio-energy in the light of land availability, agricultural technology, biodiversity and economical development (Fischer & Schrattenholzer, 2001; Berndes et al., 2003; Hoogwijk et al., 2003; Smeets et al., 2007; Dornburg et al., 2008).”
- Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: Global and regional effects of mitigation, 2000–2080 (2007, background): “A discussion on the derivation within BLS of numbers on the supply of crop residues, livestock energy requirements, and digestible energy has been published [33].”