Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: : A firm-level innovation study

By Hans Lööf, Almas Heshmati. 2002

606 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/337e6d7874b51c31cfa2769e3da9937fda042c53

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. S. Roper
2. J. Love
3. G. van Leeuwen
4. L. Klomp
5. Jun Du
6. Nola Hewitt-Dundas
7. E. Mcvittie
8. Karl-Heinz Leitner

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Love
2. S. Roper
3. M. Vivarelli
4. Pierre Mohnen
5. Jacques Mairesse
6. Nola Hewitt-Dundas
7. G. van Leeuwen
8. Boris Lokshin

Citations in the corpus

• Productivity effects of innovation modes (2009, background): “Examples of such studies include Lööf and Heshmati (2002) and Van Leeuwen and Klomp (2006).”
• Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms (2006, background): “Some authors use innovation survey data to test the effect of potential barriers to innovation on firms’ innovation activities (e.g., Lööf and Heshmati 2002; Veugelers and Cassiman 1999).”
• Generic strategies and firm performance in SMEs: a longitudinal study of Austrian SMEs (2010, methodology): “…respect to employment and turnover growth and replaced their values with an average annual percentage growth rate of 20% (employment) and 30% (turnover), an approach regarded appropriate in cross-sectional studies (e.g., Kothari et al. 2005) and used, for instance, by Lööf and Heshmati (2002).”
• Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity, and productivity effects (2010, background): “Examples of such studies include Lööf and Heshmati (2002) and Van Leeuwen and Klomp (2006).”
• Modelling the innovation value chain (2008, methodology): “In terms of heterogeneity, it is clear that very large variations can exist in business performance even in narrowly defined industries (see Caves, 1998 for a survey; and on innovation behaviour see Lööf and Heshmati, 2002).”
• Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical approaches (2018, background): “The innovation writing likewise incorporates different experimental studies supporting this relationship, as do different works that utilization econometric techniques to exhibit the relationship exactly (Lööf and Heshmati, 2002).”