Neo-Marshallian Clusters and Global Networks: The Linkages of Media Firms in Central London

By Lilach Nachum, D. Keeble. 2003

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3345cfadd60e32b5b10af9068341920e587b3f92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Rajneesh Narula
2. A. Muscio

In Strategy and Management

1. Rajneesh Narula
2. Ram Mudambi
3. K. Meyer
4. Davide Castellani
5. John H. Dunning
6. Fabio Pieri
7. Paola Criscuolo
8. G. Mcdermott

In Urban Studies

1. Rajneesh Narula

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs (2014, background): “Formal and informal institutions bind firms to other actors, including governments (Narula 2002, Nachum and Keeble 2003).”
• Foreign Location Choice: Review and Extensions (2016, unknown): “…et al. 2009; Chung and Alcácer 2002; Nicholas et al. 2001; Villaverde and Maza 2012; Webster 2013; Wu and Strange 2000), clusters (Manning et al. 2010; Nachum and Keeble 2003; Zaheer and Manrakhan 2001) and cities (Boeh and Beamish 2012; Goerzen et al. 2013; Ma and Delios 2007; Ma et al. 2013).”
• The cultural and creative industries: a review of the literature (2007, unknown): “Networking in the cultural industries has provided a rich research vein in recent years (Crewe, 1996; Coe, 2000; 2001; Grabher, 2001; 2002; 2004; Wittel, 2001; Ettlinger, 2003; Jeffcutt, 2004; Sturgeon, 2003; Nachum and Keeble, 2003; Neff, 2004; Mossig, 2004; Kong, 2005; Lange, 2005; Johns, 2006).”