DIP: The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2001 update

By Ioannis Xenarios, Esteban Fernandez, Lukasz Salwínski, Xiaoqun Joyce Duan, Michael J. Thompson, Edward M. Marcotte, David S. Eisenberg. Nucleic Acids Res., 2001

1,344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/334511feb95634c91d06359fd497d01fc60767f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. (2014, background): “Vast Uncharted Interactome Zone in Literature and Generation of a Systematic Binary Data Set (A) Validation of binary literature pairs extracted from public databases (Bader et al., 2003; Berman et al., 2000; Chatr-Aryamontri et al., 2013; Kerrien et al., 2012; Licata et al., 2012; Keshava Prasad et”
GPS 2.0, a Tool to Predict Kinase-specific Phosphorylation Sites in Hierarchy *S (2008, methodology): “The human experimental protein-protein interaction (PPI) data were derived from the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP) ( 31 ), BioGrid (32), the Molecular Interaction Database (MINT) (33), the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND) (34), and the Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD) ”
cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome (2014, methodology): “Database of Interacting Proteins used in this study is from DIP database ([18])(http://dip.”
HIPPIE: Integrating Protein Interaction Networks with Experiment Based Quality Scores (2012, background): “(release date: December 30, 2009) [5], HPRD (version 8; release date: July 6, 2009) [6], IntAct (release date: March 29, 2010) [7], MINT (release date: 9 November 2009) [8], BIND (2004 release [11]), and MIPS (published: November 5, 2004) [10].”
Mining literature for protein-protein interactions (2001, background): “…are generating new insights * These authors contributed equally to this work. into how cells are organized, such as demonstrating that protein–protein interactions link many proteins in the cell into just a few, large, connected interaction networks (Marcotte, 2000; Xenarios et al., 2001).”
PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks (2004, background): “Target protein–protein interaction networks are drawn from the DIP database ( 21 ) and currently include Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6,7,9,10), H.pylori (5), Drosophila melanogaster (12) and Caenorhabditis elegans (11).”
Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network (2005, unknown): “dtd" [ ]> We began by assembling a collection of genomic and proteomic data potentially useful in predicting human protein-protein interactions that included model organism protein-protein interaction”