International emissions trading with endogenous allowance choices
By Carsten Helm. 2003
243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33223ab1dd79c9823fd9b09bbc7596c34a77247c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Anthoff
- Richard S. J. Tol
- T. Sterner
- Adam B. Jaffe
- L. Goulder
- Ottmar Edenhofer
- Stephanie La Hoz Theuer
- C. Flachsland
Citations in the corpus
- Linking carbon markets: concepts, case studies and pathways (2009, unknown): “With regard to distribution, game-theoretic analyses using a standard emissions game framework demonstrate that enabling allowance trade can create incentives for net selling countries to relax caps in order to gain from additional sales (Helm, 2003).”
- National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Some analysts believe the opposite, that it will be easier to link taxation systems 42 within an international agreement, (Helm, 2003; Nordhaus, 2007; Jaffe et al., 2009; Metcalf and 43 Weisbach, 2011) and 15.”
- On International Equity Weights and National Decision Making on Climate Change (2010, background): “See Bradford (2005), Helm (2002), Rehdanz and Tol (2005), and Tol (2005) for ways to reconcile non-cooperative target-setting with international trade in emission permits.”
- To link or not to link: benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems (2009, methodology): “For instance, using a standard emissions game framework, Helm (2003) found that linking creates an incentive for permit sellers (low-damage countries) to relax their cap in order to sell even more permits.”
- Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement (2018, background): “The environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms has also been studied outside the context of the UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol, with a focus on international linking of emissions trading schemes (Beuermann, Bingler, Santikarn, Tänzler, & Thema, 2017; Bodansky, Hoedl, Metcalf, &”