Progress from CASP6 to CASP7

By Andriy Kryshtafovych, Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult. 2007

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems and Management, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Hardware and Architecture

1. John Moult
2. Andriy Kryshtafovych
3. Krzysztof Fidelis
4. Vijay S. Pande

In Information Systems and Management

1. John Moult
2. Andriy Kryshtafovych
3. Daron M. Standley

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. John Moult
2. Andriy Kryshtafovych
3. Krzysztof Fidelis
4. Torsten Schwede
5. Sandor Vajda
6. Vijay S. Pande
7. Roland L. Dunbrack
8. Tanja Kortemme

Citations in the corpus

• Outcome of a Workshop on Applications of Protein Models in Biomedical Research (2009, background): “Recent progress measured in the CASP experiments (Kopp et al., 2007; Kryshtafovych et al., 2007) suggests that this coverage is not an unreasonable expectation.”
• CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments (2013, neutral): “5.”
• The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources (2008, unknown): “…protein structure prediction, e.g. during the bi-annual CASP (Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction) experiments (10,11) or the automated EVA project (12), has demonstrated that comparative protein structure modelling is currently the most accurate technique for…”
• Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. (2010, background): “Homology modeling methods, however, are often not accurate enough for practical purposes because of our inability to successfully refine the structure of a template protein based on the target sequence (41).”
• Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category (2007, unknown): “15–19 We thus designed a naı¨ve predictor that scores TBM models by assigning a value related to their distance from the closest template.”
• Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9 (2011, background): “It is usually approximated by combining various parameters22,39 and varies significantly between CASPs.”
• Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8 (2009, background): “17 However, here, we are given structures that have already been once-refined.”
• Comparative modeling in structural genomics. (2008, methodology): “While some of the results from the 1994 experiment were not impressive, the accuracy and power of comparative modeling techniques has improved beyond recognition in the intervening years (Kryshtafovych et al., 2007; Moult, 2005).”