Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose Estimation
By Nikolay A. Atanasov, Bharathwaj Sankaran, Jerome Le Ny, George Pappas, Kostas Daniilidis. 2014
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Wolfram Burgard
- Dieter Fox
- Luca Carlone
- Niko Sünderhauf
- Michael Milford
- Peter Corke
- Ben Upcroft
- Sergey Levine
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Kristen Grauman
- Andrew Zisserman
- Xiaogang Wang
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
Citations in the corpus
- The limits and potentials of deep learning for robotics (2018, background): “Some work is undertaken in the area of next-best view-point prediction to improve object detection [5], [25], [73], [130] or path planning for exploration on a mobile robot [14], but a more holistic approach to active scene understanding is still missing from current research.”
- Active vision for dexterous grasping of novel objects (2016, background): “Active perception has also been applied to object recognition [2], and to touch for grasping under uncertainty [19], [22].”
- Recovering 6D Object Pose and Predicting Next-Best-View in the Crowd (2015, methodology): “There have been various methods proposed for computing the entropy reduction [2, 9, 33].”
- A Survey on Active Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: State of the Art and New Frontiers (2022, background): “Active object-level SLAM has been considered in [93], [94].”
- Deep active object recognition by joint label and action prediction (2015, background): “focus on the comparison of myopic greedy action selection that looks ahead only one step and non-myopic action selection which considers several time steps into the future [12].”