Offender emotion and self-regulation: implications for offender rehabilitation programming

By A. Day. 2009

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Maladaptive emotion regulation and aggression in adult offenders (2014, background): “Second, to avoid emotions, an individual may engage in thought processes that are less meaningful than usual (Ward et al., 2008), leading to a narrow, concrete focus on the present that does not include long-term goals (Baumeister, 1990), reducing inhibitions against aggression (Day, 2009).”
Mindfulness and other Buddhist-derived interventions in correctional settings: A systematic review (2013, background): “These proposals are also grounded in findings of BDI studies (from both forensic and general population/clinical settings) whereby BDIs have been shown to modulate known criminogenic agents, such as negative affective states (Day, 2009), anger (Novaco, 2007), hostility (Perelman et al.”
Emotion Regulation and Aggression: The Incremental Contribution of Alexithymia, Impulsivity, and Emotion Dysregulation Facets (2017, background): “…a traditional view of negative emotions as something bad that need to be tamed, in turn neglecting the potential importance of other aspects of the broader emotion regulation construct, such as the ability to let emotions unfold acknowledging their adaptive value (Day, 2009; Roberton et al., 2015).”