Enron discourse: the rhetoric of a resilient capitalism

By R. Craig, Joel H. Amernic. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32aba6cc7f736684cdb46438dd56415eaa50f53f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Conroy
2. D. Merkl-Davies
3. Niamh M. Brennan
4. Bahram Soltani
5. Gail T. Fairhurst

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Conroy
2. D. Merkl-Davies
3. Niamh M. Brennan
4. Bahram Soltani
5. Gail T. Fairhurst

Citations in the corpus

• A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives (2011, background): “…from specific impression management tactics to broader strategies used to present a particular version of events, such as rhetoric (see, for example, Driscoll and Crombie, 2001; Livesey, 2002; Craig and Amernic, 2004b, 2006, 2008) or symbolic management (see, for example Linsley and Kajüter, 2008).”
• Discretionary Disclosure Strategies in Corporate Narratives: Incremental Information or Impression Management? (2008, unknown): “…this vein, a variety of studies demonstrate how corporate leadership uses rhetoric in corporate narrative documents to imprint their view of reality and thus to control outsiders’ perceptions of the firm [Hyland, 1998]; [Amernic and Craig, 2004]; [Craig and Amernic, 2004]; [Crowther et al., 2006].”
• Executive Hubris: The Case of a Bank CEO (2013, methodology): “Executives at Enron have been accused of suffering from hubris and of being overly confident in their discourse (Craig and Amernic, 2004).”
• The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals (2014, background): “…large number of published papers in academic and professional journals (e.g., Arnold and De Lange 2004; Baker and Hayes 2004; Brody et al. 2003; Craig and Amernic 2004; Cullinan 2004; Ferrell and Ferrell 2011; Hogan et al. 2008; Morrison 2004; O’Connell 2004; Rezaee 2005; Reinstein and…”
• Considering context in discursive leadership research (2009, background): “Finally, the close links between discourse and text in Sillince’s work (2007) and others (Craig & Amernic, 2004; Fairclough, 1992; Phillips et al., 2004; Stein, 2007; Vaara & Tienari, 2008) point to the potential for intertextuality as texts have the ability to layer, interweave, and supply context…”