Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective

By Adrian Pilkington. 2000

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3284be192cb3d28719672a0caf54c566ea69323a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Markus Tendahl
2. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
3. Ofer Fein
4. R. Giora
5. A. Kronrod
6. Idit Elnatan
7. Noa Shuval
8. A. Zur

Citations in the corpus

• Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings (2004, background): “But, even if we forgo this reservation, even though some findings can be accounted for by RT (see also Pilkington, 2000), the whole array of findings cannot.”
• Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. (2008, background): “A different perspective on metaphor comes from relevance theory (Carston, 2002; Pilkington, 2000; Sperber and Wilson, 1995, in press; Wilson and Carston, 2006), which is rooted in a broad theoretical framework for explaining cognition and communication.”