Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds

By J. Verboom, R. Foppen, P. Chardon, P. Opdam, P. Luttikhuizen. 2001

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/322a5b715b47b748c10ffe0ba61bc2fdba53274d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Connectivity, Probabilities and Persistence: Comparing Reserve Selection Strategies (2006, background): “These results support the common claim that reserve selection should not be based on presence–absence data only, but incorporate spatial population dynamics as well (Nicholls 1998; Hanski 1999; Cabeza and Moilanen 2001; Verboom et al. 2001).”
Extinction threshold in metapopulation models (2003, methodology): “The number of such species that are doomed to extinction but have not yet had time to go extinct has been termed the extinction debt ( Tilman et al. 1994, Hanski & Ovaskainen 2002).”
Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx (2004, background): “The connectivity of patches has often been considered as purely a function of distance (cf. Ricketts 2001; Verboom et al. 2001).”
Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland (2007, background): “The broad zonation we have produced here can provide the spatial context for subsequent planning and analysis at a more detailed level, accounting for example for species life-histories and spatial cohesion (Vos et al. 2001; Verboom et al. 2001; Opdam et al. 2003; Moilanen et al. 2005).”
Designing a Coherent Ecological Network for Large Mammals in Northwestern Europe (2003, methodology): “OF FRAGMENTATION LARCH distinguishes between three different levels of fragmentation, corresponding to three possible situations in which a network is expected to be viable (Verboom et al. 2001).”
Factors Affecting the Distribution of a Waterbird Community: The Role of Habitat Configuration and Bird Abundance (2004, background): “…are a patched habitat immersed in a surrounding terrestrial landscape, where organisms seem to be affected by the natural insularity of the environment (Brown and Dinsmore 1986; Knutson et al. 1999; Rey Benayas et al. 1999; Naugle et al. 1999; Wettstein and Schmid 1999; Verboom et al. 2001).”
Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) (2003, methodology): “4 The cost-distance grid shows the spatial cohesion between patches, and can be used in models for design and optimisation of ecological networks Verboom et al. 2001; Adriaensen et al. in press 5 It may further improve spatially explicit population models where transition probabilities of emigrants…”
How can Habitat Selection Affect the use of a Wetland Complex by Waterbirds? (2006, background): “Subsequently, species traits should be incorporated when analysing avian distribution in wetlands (see e.g., Owen and Black 1990; Finlayson et al. 1992; Montes et al. 1995; Van Vessem et al. 1997; Verboom et al. 2001; Parsons et al. 2002).”