Biological control of weeds by means of plant pathogens: Significance for integrated weed management in modern agro-ecology

By R. Charudattan. BioControl (Dordrecht), 2001

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3228bb4fb4760a3de8dc56085ce0bd4f3c19ea1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. S. Jaronski
2. G. Ash
3. A. Bajwa
4. T. W. Culliney
5. S. Hallett
6. R. Aly
7. M. Fernández-Aparicio
8. Diego Rubiales

In Plant Science

1. K. D. Hyde
2. G. Ash
3. K. Jabran
4. A. Bajwa
5. E. McKenzie
6. M. Fernández-Aparicio
7. S. Jaronski
8. T. W. Culliney

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: What makes a good biological control target? (2005, methodology): “Nothanguina phyllobia Thorne Annual herb Seed Robinson et al. (1978) Untried/ineffective projects–inundative agents A total of 45 projects; data not included herein; see Charudattan (2001a) a Compiled from data in Charudattan (2001a); Julien and Griffiths (1998) and references cited herein.”
• Ecological considerations in producing and formulating fungal entomopathogens for use in insect biocontrol (2010, background): “…the past 50 years, the control of insects, weeds, and plant diseases with fungal pathogens has been a very active area of research and has resulted in a large number of commercially-available products (Butt et al. 2001; Charudattan 2001; Wraight et al. 2001; Fravel 2005; Faria and Wraight 2007).”
• Sustainable weed management in conservation agriculture (2014, background): “Charudattan (2001) reviewed the importance and effectiveness of many plant pathogens as bio control agents for noxious weeds.”
• Where are the bioherbicides? (2005, background): “The small but varied selection of bioherbicides currently registered or in production in different parts of the world have been listed and reviewed (Boyetchko 1997; Charudattan 2001; Weston 1999), and a number of pathogens currently under development are listed in Charudattan (2001).”
• The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens (2011, background): “Research on biological control of weeds should target the most urgent and problematic weeds where management by conventional methods are not working and biocontrol would have potentially significant benefits for users (Auld and Morin 1995; Greaves et al. 1998; Charudattan 2001).”
• Conventional and biotechnological approaches for control of parasitic weeds (2007, background): “cumana (Charudattan 2001).”
• Benefits of Classical Biological Control for Managing Invasive Plants (2005, background): “There are several cases of highly successful weed control using fungi (Charudattan, 2001).”
• Eco-biology and management of Echinochloa crus-galli (2015, background): “crus-galli (Charudattan, 2001).”
• The science, art and business of successful bioherbicides (2010, background): “(and biopesticides more generally) have been reported (Charudattan, 2001).”
• Innovations in parasitic weeds management in legume crops. A review (2011, background): “Effectiveness of biological control could be increased by the combination of two or more pathogens (Charudattan 2001).”