The science, art and business of successful bioherbicides

By G. Ash. 2010

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de10ddcb1a0b94f337d1a263603264d856ed513e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. E. McKenzie
2. K. D. Hyde
3. B. Chauhan
4. Xingzhong Liu
5. A. Bajwa
6. K. Jabran

In Molecular Biology

1. K. D. Hyde
2. E. McKenzie
3. Ehsanullah
4. B. Chauhan
5. Ali H. Bahkali
6. Xingzhong Liu
7. K. Jabran
8. E. Chukeatirote

In Plant Science

1. K. D. Hyde
2. K. Jabran
3. E. McKenzie
4. Ali H. Bahkali
5. E. Chukeatirote
6. A. Bajwa
7. Ehsanullah
8. M. Shahid

Citations in the corpus

• The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens (2011, background): “A greater use of mycoherbicides is important with the movement towards organic farming and the restricted use of herbicides (Ash 2010; Bailey et al. 2010).”
• Bioherbicides: Dead in the water? A review of the existing products for integrated weed management (2016, unknown): “Bioherbicides are currently underused for many reasons (Ash, 2010; Auld and Morin, 1995), although we will not detail them here.”
• Eco-biology and management of Echinochloa crus-galli (2015, background): “Although biological weed control is not as popular and common as the other methods of weed control, it has gained significance as a weed control method with no negative effects on environment and human health (Charudattan, 2005; Ash, 2010).”