Can cascades be predicted?

By Rediet Abebe. The Web Conference, 2014

869 citations recorded by the source corpus.

On many social networking web sites such as Facebook and Twitter, resharing or reposting functionality allows users to share others' content with their own friends or followers. As content is reshared from user to user, large cascades of reshares can form. While a growing body of research has focused on analyzing and characterizing such cascades, a recent, parallel line of work has argued that the future trajectory of a cascade may be inherently unpredictable. In this work, we develop a framework for addressing cascade prediction problems. On a large sample of photo reshare cascades on Facebook, we find strong performance in predicting whether a cascade will continue to grow in the future. We find that the relative growth of a cascade becomes more predictable as we observe more of its reshares, that temporal and structural features are key predictors of cascade size, and that initially, breadth, rather than depth in a cascade is a better indicator of larger cascades. This prediction performance is robust in the sense that multiple distinct classes of features all achieve similar performance. We also discover that temporal features are predictive of a cascade's eventual shape. Observing independent cascades of the same content, we find that while these cascades differ greatly in size, we are still able to predict which ends up the largest.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3210f38625d086d56ba02704f95662520e7b9560

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Mark Newman
  2. Qiaozhu Mei
  3. Duncan J. Watts
  4. Alessandro Vespignani
  5. Jon M. Kleinberg
  6. Walter Quattrociocchi
  7. Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
  8. Zeya Yang

In Information Systems

  1. Neil Shah
  2. Srijan Kumar
  3. Qiaozhu Mei
  4. Zeya Yang
  5. Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
  6. R. Fern'andez
  7. Wentao Robin Ouyang
  8. Xueqi Cheng

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Mark Newman
  2. Duncan J. Watts
  3. Emilio Ferrara
  4. Kristina Lerman
  5. Jon M. Kleinberg
  6. Jure Leskovec
  7. Gregory Stoddard
  8. Alessandro Vespignani

Citations in the corpus