Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
By Jake M. Hofman, Duncan J. Watts, Susan Athey, F. Garip, T. Griffiths, Jon M. Kleinberg, Helen Z. Margetts, Sendhil Mullainathan, Matthew J. Salganik, Simine Vazire and 2 more. Nature, 2021
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Social Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16cd0cadc4a757d85da6bd72992f6fb75a685ac7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Gianni Barlacchi
- Massimilano Luca
- Luca Pappalardo
- Filippo Simini
- Sayash Kapoor
- Arvind Narayanan
- Sunipa Dev
- Arjun Narayan
In Sociology and Political Science
- Gianni Barlacchi
- Luca Pappalardo
- Sayash Kapoor
- Arvind Narayanan
- Arjun Narayan
- Aleksandra Korolova
- Cynthia Dwork
- Manas A. Pathak
Citations in the corpus
- A Deep Gravity model for mobility flows generation (2020, background): “Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction is crucial to interpret results, explain differences between models, and assess to what extent we understand the phenomenon under analysis 67 – 69 .”
- Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024, unknown): “Epistemic risks arise here from failing to appreciate the largely invisible “researcher degrees of freedom” that are embedded in the process of approximation 113 .”
- Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science (2023, methodology): “This is despite the fact that the LR models were not trained to optimize predictive accuracy: they were conceived as explanatory models to understand past conflicts instead of predicting future ones.(47,81,82) We test our model info sheets on the four civil war prediction papers with errors and find”