Residuals and Influence in Regression
By S. Chatterjee, R. Dennis Cook, Sanford Weisberg. 1982
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streaming (2020, neutral): “Following [34] and using the result of [14], under twice differentiability and strict convexity of the inner loss, the empirical influence function at k is ∂θ ∗ ∂ε ∣∣ ε=0 =− ( ∂(2) ∑n i=1 w ∗ S,i`i(θ ∗) ∂θ∂θ> )−1 ∇θ`k(θ).”
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation (2020, background): “A famous proxy for the classical leave-one-one influence is the influence function [12].”
- Improving Question Answering Model Robustness with Synthetic Adversarial Data Generation (2021, methodology): “Influence Functions We use influence functions (Cook and Weisberg, 1982; Koh and Liang, 2017) to estimate the effect on the validation loss of including a synthetic example as explored by Yang et al.”
- Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 (2014, background): “The hat matrix The hat matrix, H, is a useful object in linear model diagnostics (Cook and Weisberg 1982).”
- Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learning (2019, background): “LOO is often approximated by leverage or influence score, which measures how the predictor changes when the weight of one point changes slightly (Cook & Weisberg, 1982).”
- G-DAug: Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoning (2020, methodology): “Fortu-nately, the validation loss change can be efficiently approximated through the use of influence functions (Atkinson et al., 1983; Koh and Liang, 2017 The main result from previous work (Atkinson et al., 1983; Koh and Liang, 2017) tells us that the influence of upweighting a training example x by…”
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Models (2019, background): “is also known as the influence function of the training point (xn, yn) on the parameter vector w∗ (Cook and Weisberg, 1982; Koh and Liang, 2017).”
- A local influence approach to sensitivity analysis of incomplete longitudinal ordinal data (2001, background): “The best known perturbation schemes are based on case-deletion (Cook and Weisberg, 1982) in which the effect is studied of completely removing cases from the analysis.”
- Robust Computation of Linear Models by Convex Relaxation (2012, background): “4 Screening for Outliers Another common approach is to remove possible outliers and then estimate the underlying subspace by PCA [15,66,67].”
- Model selection procedures in social research: Monte-Carlo simulation results (2008, methodology): “As such, we explored the underlying data structure of each of our six models using standard regression diagnostics for linearity and heteroscedasticity, casebased model criticism tools for goodness-of-fit, leverage, and influence [4]; as well as several methods for assessing multivariate normality a”
- Identifying multiple influential observations in linear regression (2005, background): “These residuals are also known as internally and externally Studentized residuals respectively (see Cook & Weisberg, 1982 ) in the literature.”
- Influence Diagnostics for Elliptical Multivariate Linear Regression Models (2003, methodology): “Diagnostic methods for the normal linear regression model have been amply investigated in the statistical literature (see, for instance, Belsley et al, 1980 ; Cook, 1982 ; Chatterjee and Hadi, 1988 ).”
- Adolescent Self-Esteem and Gender: Exploring Relations to Sexual Harassment, Body Image, Media Influence, and Emotional Expression (2001, methodology): “Outliers were checked by reviewing numerical ranges and by using the Cook's D distance procedure (Cook and Weisberg, 1982), resulting in the deletion of 4 cases.”
- Robust continuum regression (2005, background): “However, even the influence function of classical continuum regression itself has not yet been established, except in the special cases of δ = 0 [20] and δ = 0.”
- Product Fit Uncertainty in Online Markets: Nature, Effects, and Antecedents (2014, unknown): “Furthermore, we did not detect influ-ential observations or outliers using Cook’s distance (Cook 1977, Cook and Weisberg 1982) following Belsley et al. (1980).”
- The Generalized Birnbaum–Saunders Distribution and Its Theory, Methodology, and Application (2008, methodology): “An important diagnostics technique of the global influence method is the Cook's distance; see Cook and Weisberg ( 1982 ).”
- Diagnostic Checks for Multilevel Models (2008, background): “Such measures are called externally studentized residuals [11] or deletion residuals [2].”