Public‐Private Partnerships: Governance Scheme or Language Game?

By G. Hodge, C. Greve. 2010

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31d19d004ade81830c339432b045922d6b5c2c09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Matti Siemiatycki
2. Antoni Verger
3. Rui Cunha Marques
4. Kean Birch

In Strategy and Management

1. Matti Siemiatycki
2. Antoni Verger
3. Rui Cunha Marques
4. Nuno Ferreira da Cruz
5. Kean Birch

Citations in the corpus

• MIXED COMPANIES AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE: NO MAN CAN SERVE TWO MASTERS (2012, background): “These concerns have been lately addressed in the literature (e.g. see McQuaid and Scherrer 2010; Hodge and Greve 2010; and Marques and Berg 2010).”
• Framing and selling global education policy: the promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts (2012, background): “In contrast, expressions such as PPPs invite more people and organizations to join the debate and enable private organizations to get a market share over public service provision with more ease (Hodge and Greve 2010 ; Linder 1999 ; Savas 2000 ; Teisman and Klijn 2002 ).”
• Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketization (2016, background): “to less critical literature on marketization, especially PPPs, the transfer of risk is one of the key benefits of PPPs; see Deloitte (2006), Kwak et al. (2009) and Bel et al.”