A Nation-Wide Laboratory. Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioral experiments into representative surveys

By Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher, B. Rosenbladt, Jürgen Schupp, Gert G. Wagner. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 2002

446 citations recorded by the source corpus.

"Typically, laboratory experiments suffer from homogeneous subject pools and self-selection biases. The usefulness of survey data is limited by measurement error and by the questionability of their behavioral relevance. Here we present a method integrating interactive experiments and representative surveys thereby overcoming crucial weaknesses of both approaches. One of the major advantages of our approach is that it allows for the integration of experiments, which require interaction among the participants, with a survey of non-interacting respondents in a smooth and inexpensive way. We illustrate the power of our approach with the analysis of trust and trustworthiness in Germany by combining representative survey data with representative behavioral data from a social dilemma experiment. We identify which survey questions intended to elicit people’s trust correlate well with behaviorally exhibited trust in the experiment. People above the age of 65, highly skilled workersnand people living in bigger households exhibit less trusting behavior. Foreign citizens, Catholics andnpeople favoring the Social Democratic Party or the Christian Democratic Party exhibit more trust.nPeople above the age of 65 and those in good health behave more trustworthy or more altruistically,nrespectively. People below the age of 35, the unemployed and people who say they are in favor ofnnone of the political parties behave less trustworthy or less altruistically, respectively."

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31ab4e8ba2632d87cb64e981fb33ee9d431d8377

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Herbert Gintis
  2. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
  3. Klaus M. Schmidt
  4. Matthias Sutter
  5. Jean-Robert Tyran
  6. Christian Thöni
  7. Marie-Claire Villeval
  8. Bruno S. Frey

In Safety Research

  1. Ernst Fehr
  2. Simon Gächter
  3. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
  4. Bruno S. Frey
  5. Stephan Meier
  6. Matthias Sutter
  7. Armin Falk
  8. Klaus M. Schmidt

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Ernst Fehr
  2. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
  3. Bruno S. Frey
  4. Klaus M. Schmidt
  5. Christian Thöni
  6. Matthias Sutter
  7. Stephan Meier
  8. Simon Gächter

Citations in the corpus