Ocean Planet or Thick Atmosphere: On the Mass-Radius Relationship for Solid Exoplanets with Massive Atmospheres

By E. Adams, Sara Seager, L. Elkins‐Tanton. 2007

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The bulk composition of an exoplanet is commonly inferred from its average density. For small planets, however, the average density is not unique within the range of compositions. Variations of a number of important planetary parameters—which are difficult or impossible to constrain from measurements alone—produce planets with the same average densities but widely varying bulk compositions. We find that adding a gas envelope equivalent to 0.1%-10% of the mass of a solid planet causes the radius to increase 5%-60% above its gas-free value. A planet with a given mass and radius might have substantial water ice content (a so-called ocean planet), or alternatively a large rocky iron core and some H and/or He. For example, a wide variety of compositions can explain the observed radius of GJ 436b, although all models require some H/He. We conclude that the identification of water worlds based on the mass-radius relationship alone is impossible unless a significant gas layer can be ruled out by other means.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31889a05d3385322e7a2480d1e8ad483d18c20ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. N. Madhusudhan
  3. J. Owen
  4. D. Charbonneau
  5. Sara Seager
  6. C. Mordasini
  7. A. Showman
  8. H. Knutson

In Instrumentation

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. J. Owen
  3. D. Charbonneau
  4. N. Madhusudhan
  5. Timothy Morton
  6. H. Knutson
  7. A. Showman
  8. C. Mordasini

Citations in the corpus