A lower bound to the social cost of CO2 emissions.

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity (2018, methodology): “The difficulties in measuring the monetary benefits of emission reductions have been discussed extensively in the literature (see, for example, Azar, 1998; Ackerman et al., 2009; Pindyck, 2013, 2017; Van den Bergh and Botzen, 2014; Howard and Sterner, 2017).”
Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations (2017, unknown): “While such uncertainty about the SCC indeed exists, support seems to be increasing for the view that it is higher than 100 US$ per ton CO2, as indicated by recent surveys.(118,119) One should realize, though, that controversy about the SCC value is not at all a barrier in implementing a carbon price”
Does the presence of wind turbines have negative externalities for people in their surroundings? Evidence from well-being data (2017, background): “We assume a value of 50 Euro per ton (Foley et al., 2013; van den Bergh and Botzen, 2014, 2015).”