Does the presence of wind turbines have negative externalities for people in their surroundings? Evidence from well-being data
By Christian Krekel, Alexander Zerrahn. 2017
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Throughout the world, governments foster the deployment of wind power to mitigate negative externalities of conventional electricity generation, notably CO2 emissions. Wind turbines, however, are not free of externalities themselves, particularly interference with landscape aesthetics. We quantify these negative externalities using the life satisfaction approach. To this end, we combine household data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) with a novel panel dataset on over 20,000 installations. Based on geographical coordinates and construction dates, we establish causality in a difference-in-differences design. Matching techniques drawing on exogenous weather data and geographical locations of residence ensure common trend behaviour. We show that the construction of wind turbines close to households exerts significant negative external effects on residential well-being, although they seem both spatially and temporally limited, being restricted to about 4000m around households and decaying after five years at the latest. Robustness checks, including view shed analyses based on digital terrain models and placebo regressions, confirm our results.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be9c243eb0ee89ca426ed2bae5f5ce19ab23de58
Citations in the corpus
- High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (2021, unknown): “The first category of impacts relates to landscape quality, measured by direct indicators such as surveys on the willingness-to-pay or willingness-to-accept [224,230], by life satisfaction surveys [240], by surveys rating landscape quality [241], or by experiments measuring the physiological and beh”