Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project

1,316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development (2019, methodology): “Whilst the development of a codebook is not considered a time efficient mode for analysis [2], it enables a discussion and possibility of replication within qualitative methods utilising what could be considered a quantitative tool.”
Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research (2020, methodology): “Informed by grounded theory, codes can come from the data itself (inductive coding) as well as particular theoretical or epistemological positions (deductive coding; DeCuir-Gunby et al., 2011).”
Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis (2016, background): “Coding reduces the amount of raw data to that which is relevant to the research question, breaks the data down to manageable sections, and takes researchers through the transformation of raw data to higher-level insights or abstractions as the development of theme.[5, 39, 40] Researchers recognise c”
Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support (2015, methodology): “Coupled with the codebook guidelines that DeCuir-Gunby, Marshall, and McCulloch (2011) present, the researcher can begin to acquire a strong sense of the concepts they are looking for in the literature and what they mean by those concepts.”