Effects of non‐steady‐state iron limitation on nitrogen assimilatory enzymes in the marine diatom thalassiosira weissflogii (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE)

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forming the primary nitrite maximum: Nitrifiers or phytoplankton? (2006, background): “Therefore iron, as well as light, limitation may exert a control on autotrophic NO 22 cycling in the Sargasso Sea (e.g., Milligan and Harrison 2000).”
Phytoplankton competition during the spring bloom in four Plankton Functional Type Models (2012, background): “…of phytoplankton including diatoms and nanophytoplankton widely vary from 0.2 to 3.3 day−1 under conditions of saturating light and nutrient sufficiency (e.g., Williams, 1964; Eppley and Sloan, 1966; Blasco et al., 1982; Schone, 1982; Tang, 1995; Kudo et al., 2000; and Milligan and Harrison, 2000).”
The elemental stoichiometry and composition of an iron‐limited diatom (2005, background): “Indeed, energy limitation has been invoked by others (Sakshaug and Holm-Hansen 1977; Muggli and Harrison 1996; Milligan and Harrison 2000) to explain the biochemical consequences of Fe limitation in phytoplankton.”
Dissolved organic nitrogen: a dynamic participant in aquatic ecosystems (2003, background): “Urease activity in T. weissflogii was unaffected by iron limitation but sensitive to that of nickel (Milligan & Harrison 2000).”