Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers
By Keith Head, John Ries. 2003
429 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/311f36c528d2534cf960c6258424559a1e974220
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- M. Chen
- Stefano Federico
- Thierry Mayer
- E. Helpman
- Jiangyong Lu
- Eiichi Tomiura
- Jens Matthias Arnold
- K. Hussinger
In Strategy and Management
- Stefano Federico
- E. Helpman
- Jiangyong Lu
- Xiaohui Liu
- Eiichi Tomiura
- M. Chen
- Joel Stiebale
- Horst Raff
Citations in the corpus
- Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms (2006, background): “See also Keith Head and John Ries (2003 for evidence from Japan; Sourafel Girma, Holger Görg and Eric Strobl (2004) for evidence from Ireland; evidence from the United Kingdom. proximity-con-centration trade-off, for which Brainard (1997) provides empirical evidence Namely, by choosing FDI instead…”
- Expanding to outward foreign direct investment or not? A multi-dimensional analysis of entry mode transformation of Chinese private exporting firms (2014, background): “Increasing returns to scale at plant level create incentives to concentrate production in one place and use exporting for internationalisation, while transportation and transaction costs associated with the distance between the locations of production and sales provide a countervailing pressure…”
- The Location of Domestic and Foreign Production Affiliates by French Multinational Firms (2010, background): “…related estimations typically focus on only one aspect of the decision process: The choice between exporting and making FDI in Brainard (1997) and Head and Ries (2003) for instance or the conditional location choice in, among many others, Coughlin et al. (1991), Head et al. (1999), Guimarães et…”
- Outsourcing versus integration at home or abroad and firm heterogeneity (2010, positive): “Size indicators are less strongly correlated with productivity measures, in line with the evidence reported by Head and Ries (2003).”
- Location Decision of Heterogeneous Multinational Firms (2009, background): “For theoretical contributions in this area, see, for example, Motta and Norman (1996), Head and Ries (2003), and Ekholm et al. (2007).”
- Exports, foreign direct investment, and productivity: evidence from German firm level data (2006, background): “Head and Ries (2003) use data for Japanese firms; they find that firms that only serve the domestic market tend to be smaller than firms”
- Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis (2005, methodology): “…and Jensen 1999, 2001), for Chile (Pavcnik 2002), Taiwan and Korea (Aw et al. 2000), for Colombia, Mexico and Morocco (Clerides et al. 1998), Japan (Head and Ries 2003), Spain (Delgado et al. 2002), Italy (Castellani 2001), the German state of 4 Lower Saxony (Bernard and Wagner 2001, Wagner 2002),…”
- Internationalisation, Innovation and Productivity: How Do Firms Differ in Italy? (2007, neutral): “Head and Ries (2003) use several indicators of performance to differentiate firms in a sample 1070”
- Foreign direct investment and firm performance: an empirical analysis of Italian firms (2016, positive): “Some theoretical contributions (Head and Ries 2003; Yeaple 2009) show that even among those companies that choose to invest abroad there may be differences in productivity, which, according to the predictions of these models, result in different investment strategies (e.”