Strong reciprocity and the welfare state

By Christina M. Fong, Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis. 2006

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30ce004dcd20007be7938401bf6330f3ca6cbe0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications (2006, background): “There is evidence that people resent certain welfare policies if they think that the recipient is a free rider who could earn his or her own living (Wax 2000; Fong et al. 2005).”
Do fairness and race matter in generosity? Evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment (2011, unknown): “The strong reciprocity motive can be generalized such that people may want to reward those who have helped others or society in general and to punish those who have hurt others or society in general (Fong et al., 2006; Servátka, 2009).”
Parental background and other-regarding preferences in children (2014, unknown): “Other-regarding preferences are therefore recognized as important for a range of economic and social outcomes, including market performance (Leibbrandt 2012), public life and politics (Fong et al. 2006), and cooperation in the workplace (Fehr and Fischbacher 2002).”
The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations (2004, background): “For instance, there is extensive support for income redistribution in advanced industrial economies, even among those who cannot expect to be net beneficiaries (Fong et al., 2002).”
Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic (2011, unknown): “Ultimately, psychological research suggests that the question of whether a needy person is deserving or not relates to whether that person is intentionally attempting to free-ride on the hard work of others (Cosmides & Tooby 1992; Fong et al. 2006).”
ETHNIC DIVERSITY, PUBLIC SPENDING, AND INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT FOR THE WELFARE STATE: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE (2013, unknown): “(See the survey by Fong et al., 2006). Razin et al. (2002) incorporate immigration into a framework”