Implications for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment

By P. Tyack. 2008

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30b17cebb44c3f01ce544e1706373577c47bec2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

A New Framework for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammals in a Rapidly Changing Arctic (2012, background): “…the focus of numerous scientific reviews and workshops over the past 40 years (e.g., Payne and Webb 1971, Fletcher and Busnel 1978, Richardson et al. 1995, NRC 2005 and the citations therein, MMC 2007, Nowacek et al. 2007, Southall et al. 2007, Weilgart 2007, Tyack 2008, Southall and Nowacek 2009).”
Consequences of global shipping traffic for marine giants (2018, unknown): “Tyack PL. 2008.”
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife (2016, background): “The Marine Mammal Protection Act stimulated noise regulation for marine mammals, and there have been several reviews of the effects of noise on these species (Richardson et al., 1995; Boyd et al., 2008; Tyack, 2008; Southall et al., 2009; Ellison et al., 2012).”
Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise (2014, unknown): “Tyack PL. 2008.”
Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change (2011, background): “In aquatic environments, where sound propagates better than light, noise from ship traffic and different commercial, research and military activities has increased over the past century (Tyack, 2008).”
A bioenergetics model to evaluate demographic consequences of disturbance in marine mammals applied to gray whales (2015, background): “This is especially critical as we attempt to interpret animals’ responses to anthropogenic activities and changing climate (Tyack 2008, 2009, Costa et al. 2010, Doney et al. 2012, Hazen et al. 2013).”
Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis, and implication (2009, unknown): “…australis) whales have been observed counter-calling out to ranges of approximately 20 km (Clark 1983, Clark 1989, Clark unpubl. data), and fin whales and humpback whales are suspected of communicating out to distances of at least 10 km (Watkins & Schevill 1979, Watkins 1981, Tyack 2008 ).”
Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? (2014, background): “Effects have been demonstrated in a variety of taxonomic groups across a range of scales, from the physiology and behavior of individuals to changes at the population and community level (see Tyack 2008; Barber et al.”
Noise negatively affects foraging and antipredator behaviour in shore crabs (2013, background): “2007) and has alone led to a 10e100-fold increase in low-frequency (20e200 Hz) ambient aquatic noise over the past century (Tyack 2008).”
In situ behavioural responses to boat noise exposure of Gobius cruentatus (Gmelin, 1789; fam. Gobiidae) and Chromis chromis (Linnaeus, 1758; fam. Pomacentridae) living in a Marine Protected Area (2010, background): “There is an increasing amount of scientific evidence that anthropogenic noise can harm marine species (Tyack, 2008).”
The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research (2011, background): “North Atlantic right whales are among the most endangered whales in the world, and the impacts of increases in ocean noise levels from human activities are a current area of concern for the conservation of marine mammals (Richardson et al., 1995; Tyack, 2008; Brumm, 2010).”
Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea (2011, background): “High noise levels are of special concern for cetaceans, which depend on sound as the most important source of information about their environment (Richardson et al. 1995, No- wacek et al. 2007, Southall et al. 2007, Weilgart 2007, Tyack, 2008).”