Emotion, cognition, and decision making
By Norbert Schwarz. 2000
927 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30af6b337fc6fc8727ebac489c28a817be780a11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- E. Tory Higgins
- Daniel C. Molden
- Scott Spiegel
- Lorraine Chen Idson
- Antonio L. Freitas
- T. Higgins
- Christopher T. Dawes
- Eva M . Oberecker
In Social Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- G. Kinman
- Louise Grant
- Jennifer M. George
- E. Tory Higgins
- Daniel C. Molden
- Peggy C. Giordano
- Stephen A. Cernkovich
In Sociology and Political Science
- Peggy C. Giordano
- Ryan D. Schroeder
- Daniel C. Molden
- E. Tory Higgins
- Charles Taber
- Milton Lodge
- Ceridwyn King
- N. Chen
Citations in the corpus
- The role of emotions in complex problem solving (2005, background): “…in a positive affective state are more likely to use heuristic top-down processing strategies, whereas negative affect facilitates careful bottom-up processing and a more systematic gathering of information (Bless & Fiedler, 1995; Hertel, Neuhof, Theuer, & Kerr, 2000; Schwarz, 1990, 2000).”
- Considering planned change anew:stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally and meaningfully (2011, background): “Similarly, studies of positive and negative emotions of individuals as consequences of external cues and as antecedents to their attitudes and behaviors have broadened the understanding of reasons individuals behave as they do (eg, Schwarz, 2000 ; Seo et al, 2004 ; Staw et al, 1994 ).”
- Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking (2004, background): “Over the last decade, scholars have focused increasing attention on the role of emotions in decision making (Bosman & van Winden, 2001; Charland, 1998; Damasio, 1994; Elster, 1998; Loewenstein & Lerner, 2002; Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001; Pillutla & Murnighan, 1996; Schwarz, 2000).”
- Consumers’ Emotional Bonds with Foreign Countries: Does Consumer Affinity Affect Behavioral Intentions? (2011, background): “Although “our everyday experiences leave little doubt that our emotions can influence the decisions we make” (Schwarz 2000, p. 433), research focusing on how consumer emotions affect foreign product purchases “has been conspicuously absent in literature” (Goldberg and Baumgartner 2002, p. 901).”
- Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance (2004, result): “These results parallel the work of others and strongly support the argument that emotions play an important role in decision making (Loewenstein et al., 2001; Schwarz, 2000; Sloman, 1996) and that emotional reactions may be a critical element of trust and the decision to rely on automation.”
- Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, neutral): “They have been demonstrated in numerous tasks involving attention, perception, memory, expectations and risk assessment [6-9].”
- Dual Tuning in a Supportive Context: Joint Contributions of Positive Mood, Negative Mood, and Supervisory Behaviors to Employee Creativity (2007, background): “moods need to be taken into account (e.g., Kaufmann, 2003; Schwarz, 2000, 2002 ).”
- The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review (2006, background): “" Quite obviously, the relationship between emotions and decision-making is bi-directional and the positive or negative outcome of a decision can profoundly aVect the decider's feelings " (Schwarz, 2000, pp. 435).”
- The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea (2014, background): “Fleming and others stressed that non-scientific factors would play a role more than scientific factors (Fleming 1986a, 1986b; Schwarz 2000; Zeidler & Schafer 1984).”
- Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene (2009, background): “This research agenda is based on the finding that an individual’s affective state alters the way he or she processes information; those in a positive mood are more likely to rely on heuristics whereas those in a negative mood eschew these heuristics and pay closer attention to the details (Schwarz 2”