BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL

By R. N. Mack, Daniel Simberloff, W. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, F. Bazzaz. 2000

6,705 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3073e8d84afa5584c00aca60073705d2891b133b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland (2007, background): “This supports the view that explaining activities and the reasons behind wildlife 395 control operations will help increase public support (Mack et al., 2000; Fraser, 2006).”
Invaders are not a random selection of species (2009, result): “…contradictory results, with some showing positive correlations between native community diversity and invasion success, while others showing negative correlations (reviewed in Moyle and Light 1996; Williamson 1996; Levine and D’Antonio 1999; Mack et al. 2000; Wonham 2006; Zaiko et al. 2007).”
Direct evidence of a biologically active coastal silicate pump: Ecological implications (2002, background): “Biotic invasions are an important component of human-driven aquatic alteration as major agents of global change (Mack et al. 2000; Grosholz 2002).”
A paradox of trout invasions in North America (2008, background): “2002), and the natural enemies hypotheses (Mack et al. 2000; Blair and Wolfe 2004), although Moyle and colleagues (Moyle and Light 1996a; Marchetti et al.”
The Economics of Pesticides and Pest Control (2007, background): “Because of exponential growth rates of invasive species and rates of dispersion, the costs of containment and eradication increase as a function of time elapsed since the invasion (Mack et al. 2000).”
Non‐target effects of broadleaf herbicide on a native perennial forb: a demographic framework for assessing and minimizing impacts (2009, background): “Invasive plants are one of the leading threats to biological diversity in natural and managed areas ( Mack et al . 2000 ).”
Impacts of introduced seaweeds (2007, background): “…which may lead to resource variability in the recipient habitat, and the establishment of invasive species and their proliferation to high abundances with associated impacts (Davis et al. 2000, Mack et al. 2000, MacDougall and Turkington 2005, Dunstan and Johnson 2007, Valentine et al. 2007).”
Diversity declines in Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass) patches (2009, background): “They have been charged with homogenizing regional biotas (McKinney, 2004) and causing local declines of native species (Lodge et al., 2000; Mack et al., 2000).”
Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach (2011, background): “Although the work on identifying future invaders and predicting their likely sites of invasion are of immense scientific and practical interest, such efforts are often inconclusive (Mack et al. 2000).”
Control of invasive alien weeds averts imminent plant extinction (2011, background): “Invasive alien species constitute a major threat to biodiversity (Mack et al. 2000; Mooney et al. 2005) and there exist many cases of extinction caused by invasive alien animals (Savidge 1987; Blackburn et al. 2004).”
ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “…such harm, and because the processes by which introduced species succeed address fundamental ecological theory, much recent attention has been devoted to understanding invasion biology (Mack et al. 2000, Maron and Vilà Manuscript received 7 February 2005; revised 10 May 2005; accepted 11 May 2005.”
The alien flora of Greece: taxonomy, life traits and habitat preferences (2010, background): “of the significant losses of the biological diversity and function of the ecosystems invaded and the economic impacts caused (Mooney and Hobbs 2000; Mack et al. 2000; Vilà et al. 2009).”
Community and ecosystem consequences of giant knotweed (Polygonum sachalinense) invasion into riparian forests of western Washington, USA (2009, background): “These species have the potential to establish dense, monotypic stands that monopolize resources and displace native species (Mack et al., 2000; Dukes and Mooney, 2004) resulting in loss of critical structures and functions from these systems (Hooper and Vitousek, 1997; Chapin et al.”
A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model (2008, background): “The difficulty is rooted in the complex and varied factors that have been demonstrated to contribute to the success or failure of an introduced species, as well as the spatial and temporal scales at which these factors operate (Mack et al. 2000).”
Alternative stable states in ecology (2003, background): “…and Kitchell 2001), outbreaks of disease following inadequate vaccination programs (Haydon et al. 1997), effects of invasion by exotic species (Mack et al. 2000; With et al. 2002), and undesirable vegetation changes in aquatic (Scheffer et al. 1993) and terrestrial (Noy-Meir 1975; Dublin et…”
Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests (2010, background): “dominant form of control, contributing to additional costs in the form of degraded environmental and human health (Mack et al. 2000; Paoletti and Pimentel 2000).”