Implicit intergroup bias: Cognitive, affective, and motivational underpinnings

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “Given its schematic quality, categorical impression formation is typically more automatic than individuation, particularly in the senses of being more rapid and efficient (i.e., less dependent on attentional resources; for a review, see Amodio & Mendoza, 2010).”
A Memory Systems Model of Implicit Social Cognition (2011, background): “These distinctions are especially pronounced in the intergroup bias literature, in which researchers often use sequential priming tasks to examine associations between social group targets and semantic concepts (i.e., stereotypes), evaluations, or affective responses (Amodio & Mendoza, 2010).”
Intergroup Perception and Cognition: An Integrative Framework for Understanding the Causes and Consequences of Social Categorization (2017, background): “…as compared with affective associations, semantic associations are more likely to be expressed in trait impressions, goal representations, and goal-directed behaviors, and are also more likely to emerge in verbal responses (Amodio & Devine, 2006; Amodio & Mendoza, 2010; Amodio & Ratner, 2011).”