The gender implications of large-scale land deals:

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gendered experiences of dispossession: oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan (2012, background): “4One of the illustrative cases summarized in Behrman et al. (2012, 68–70) is drawn from an earlier version of this paper (Julia and White 2010).”
The Long Green Revolution (2013, background): “…access to agricultural inputs are a symptom of an inequality in power that keeps more women hungry than men, women poorer than men, with differential access to land (Agarwal 1994) and education (Klasen 2002), shouldering the triple burden (Moser 1989), and so forth (Behrman et al. 2012).”
Gender and Sustainability (2014, background): “(125) highlight the importance of women’s (lack of ) state-recognized property rights in whether they have a seat at the table in negotiations.”
Gender Analysis in Forestry Research: Looking Back and Thinking Ahead (2011, unknown): “cause for concern (Behrman et al. 2011).”
Gender and generation in engagements with oil palm in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: insights from feminist political ecology (2017, background): “…an emerging literature around the gendered impacts of and responses to oil palm links with parallel debates on gender, land rights and large-scale land deals more generally (for example, Behrman, Meinzen-Dick, and Quisumbing 2012; Collins 2016; Daley and Pallas 2014; Archambault and Zoomers 2015).”