On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.

By Jennifer S. Pardo. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2006

821 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3004c3930ded383fd73e671d692ff61c812f90af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Phonetic bias in sound change (2011, background): “People do not imitate perfectly and do not completely approximate their productions to those of others (Pardo 2006, Babel 2009).”
Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production (2013, neutral): “Phonetic convergence effects have been initially explored during natural and interactive settings, notably during conversational exchanges between two speaking partners (Pardo, 2006; Aubanel and Nguyen, 2010; Pardo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2011; Lelong and Bailly, 2011).”
Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation (2011, background): “In Pardo (2006), interacting talkers increased their similarity in phonetic repertoire (phonetic convergence) during conversation, and the convergence persisted into a post-task session.”
Entrainment in Spoken Dialogue Systems: Adopting, Predicting and Influencing User Behavior (2013, background): “…lexical (Bren-nan and Clark, 1992), syntactic (Reitter and Moore, 2007; Ward and Litman, 2007), stylistic (Niederhof-fer and Pennebaker, 2002; Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil et al., 2011), acoustic-prosodic (Natale, 1975; Coul-ston et al., 2002; Ward and Litman, 2007) and phonetic (Pardo, 2006).”
Alignment in second language dialogue (2008, background): “Interlocutors also entrain on syntactic structures (Branigan et al., 2000; Levelt & Kelter, 1982), phonetic realisations of repeated words (Pardo, 2006), and accent and speech rate (Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991).”
Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue (2010, background): “Alignment effects have been found in different languages and speaker populations, including adults (e.g., Branigan, Pickering, & Cleland, 2000; Gries, 2005; Levelt & Kelter, 1982; Pardo, 2006), children (e.”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “In addition, they align on accent and speech rate (Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991) and on phonetic realizations of repeated words (Pardo, 2006).”
Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy (2019, background): “For example, phonetic productions are subject to cross-language competition (e.g., Goldrick, Runnqvist, & Costa, 2014) and phonetic convergence (e.g., Pardo, 2006).”
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension (2013, neutral): “In this context, it is important to note that the same or similar concepts have been discussed under a variety of different labels, often without further definition, including ‘‘entrainment’’ [66–68], ‘‘accommodation’’ [69–71], ‘‘alignment’’ [72], and, perhaps most importantly, ‘‘syntactic priming’’”
Measuring Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment with Respect to Multiple Levels and Dimensions (2011, background): “Pardo [4] finds phonetic proximity at the start of the conversation; this proximity increases later in the conversation.”
How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, neutral): “2000), and sound (Pardo 2006).”