From Third Sector to Social Enterprise

By J. Defourny. 2001

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fe3657a5ce4b624024a5d9207eb90feee4ecf8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Social enterprises in tourism: an exploratory study of operational models and success factors (2012, background): “Early conceptualisations (Defourny, 2001; Laville & Nyssens, 2001) emphasised the roots of the movement in the third sector and its collective and community facets; we would argue that it emanated from the same altruistic stream as the participatory and sustainable livelihoods approaches to developm”
Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market (2013, unknown): “serving community-oriented projects and social enterprises, which put the emphasis not only on financial returns but also—and often chiefly—on social aims (Defourny 2001).”
The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective (2012, background): “…constituted the conceptual basis for several EMES researches, in different industries, such as personal services or local development (Borzaga and Defourny 2001) or work integration (Nyssens 2006; Davister et al. 2004), sometimes enlarged to Central and Eastern Europe (Borzaga et al. 2008) or…”
Social enterprise as a socially rational business (2008, unknown): “It goes beyond Defourny‟s (2001) argument that social enterprise occupies space between voluntary (non-profit) and co-operative (profitmaking) businesses.”
Social enterprise in Europe: At the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector (2010, background): “International literature on this theme is thus now developing significantly (Borzaga & Defourny, 2001; Mair, Robinson, & Hockerts, 2006; Nicholls, 2006; Kerlin, 2009).”
Social Entrepreneurship: Definitions, Drivers, and Challenges (2012, background): “Defourny (2001) and other authors from the EMES network suggest that social enterprises, unlike traditional NGOs and nonprofits, have a continuous production of goods and/or services and take economic risks – bankruptcy is always a possible outcome.”
Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments (2008, background): “Source: Defourny (2001)”