Prediction of bird community composition based on point‐occurrence data and inferential algorithms: a valuable tool in biodiversity assessments

By T. Patricia Feria A., A. Townsend Peterson. 2002

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fc9a7d9f8e96628219e0261043d728af26a3307

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: a phylogenetic perspective (2003, unknown): “…circumstances (Peterson & Cohoon, 1999; Peterson, Soberon & Sanchez-Cordero, 1999; Peterson & Vieglais, 2001; Anderson, Gomez & Peterson, 2002a; Anderson, Laverde & Peterson, 2002b; Feria & Peterson, 2002; Peterson et al., 2002b; Peterson, Ball & Cohoon, 2002a; Stockwell & Peterson, 2002a, b).”
Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models (2003, background): “GARP has proven especially successful in predicting species’ potential distributions under a wide variety of situations ( Peterson and Cohoon, 1999 ; Peterson et al., 1999, 2001, 2002a,b,c ; Godown and Peterson, 2000; Sánchez-Cordero and Mart ı́nez-Meyer, 2000; Peterson, 2001; Elith and Burgman, 200”
Reconstructing the Pleistocene geography of the Aphelocoma jays (Corvidae) (2004, methodology): “We thank many colleagues for invaluable contributions toward the development of these methodologies, in particular David Vieglais, Ricardo Scachetti Pereira, and David Stockwell for their computational innovations.”
Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? (2007, methodology): “Those records are then combined with explanatory variables from interpolated climate data, and sometimes topographic, vegetation and other remote-sensed data, to estimate the ecological niche and predict the potential geographical distribution of a species (e.g. Elith & Burgmann, 2002; Feria & Peter”
Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. (2012, background): “Once envelopes are estimated, they can be applied to a variety of interesting questions, including discovery of new populations (e.g., Feria and Peterson 2002, Bourg et al. 2005), discovery of previously unknown species (e.g., Raxworthy et al. 2003), conser- vation planning (e.g., Williams et al.…”
Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling (2006, background): “The problem of non-independence is not overridden by carrying out additional field sampling for testing models within the modelled region (e.g. Feria & Peterson, 2002; Raxworthy et al., 2003; Elith et al., 2006; Stockman et al., 2006) because test data may be spatially autocorrelated with the data…”
An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions (2004, background): “In most circumstances, model performance can only be estimated through qualitative assessments (but for example of quantitative assessment see Feria & Peterson, 2002).”
Predicting the spatial distribution of an invasive plant species (Eupatorium adenophorum) in China (2007, methodology): “The general approach is described in greater detail by Feria and Peterson (2002).”
SEASONAL NICHES OF NEARCTIC-NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF MIGRATION (2004, background): “Although much more distributional information clearly exists for those species, our sources provided more-than-suffi cient information for development of predictive models (Stockwell and Peterson 2002b).”
The importance of biotic interactions in species distribution models: a test of the Eltonian noise hypothesis using parrots (2014, background): “There are still many challenges facing the field, and factors such as sample size (Stockwell & Peterson, 2002; Hernandez et al., 2006), spatial scale (Lassueur et al., 2006; Guisan et al., 2007; Trivedi et al., 2008) and the nature of the environmental data set Journal of Biogeography 41, 513–523 ª…”
Creating individual accessible area hypotheses improves stacked species distribution model performance (2018, methodology): “Species distribution models (SDMs) are seen as an important method towards estimating a species’ distributional extent (Feria & Peterson, 2002; Peterson et al., 2011; Sober on & Peterson, 2005).”
Ecological niche modeling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America (2006, methodology): “GARP modeling has been discussed in detail in e.g., Anderson et al. (2003), Feria and Peterson (2002), Levine et al. (2004) and Wiley et al. (2003).”