The Lyman alpha forest opacity and the metagalactic hydrogen ionization rate at z~ 2-4

By J. Bolton, M. Haehnelt, M. Viel, Volker Springel. 2004

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Estimates of the metagalactic hydrogen ionization rate from the Lya forest opacity in QSO absorption spectra depend on the complex density distribution of neutral hydrogen along the line of sight. We use a large suite of high-resolution hydrodynamical simulations to investigate in detail the dependence of such estimates on physical and numerical parameters in the context of ACDM models. Adopting fiducial values for cosmological parameters together with published values of the temperature of the IGM and the effective optical depth, the metagalactic ionization rates that reproduce the Lya effective optical depth at z = [2, 3, 4] are Γ HI = [1.3± 0.8 0.5 , 0.9 ± 0.3, 1.0± 0.5 0.3 ] × 10 -12 s -1 , respectively. The errors include estimates of uncertainties in the relevant physical parameters and the numerical accuracy of the simulations. We find the errors are dominated by the uncertainty in the temperature of the low-density IGM. The estimated metagalactic hydrogen ionization rate for the neutral hydrogen distribution in the current concordance ACDM model is more than four times the value inferred for that in an Einstein-de Sitter model of the same rms-density-fluctuation amplitude σ 8 . The estimated ionization rate is also more than double that expected from updated estimates of the emissivity of observed QSOs alone. A substantial contribution from galaxies appears to be required at all redshifts.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f913d3af7ee0e766f0851059c8ce9914754dccb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. C. Faucher-Giguére
  6. M. McQuinn
  7. Volker Springel
  8. C. Conroy

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. M. McQuinn
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. George D. Becker
  6. M. Haehnelt
  7. P. Madau
  8. Michael Kuhlen

Citations in the corpus