Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs.

By S. Nakano, M. Murakami. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001

1,303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f85758f9ae22fa4ee2237c517248240e2d3ff26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. (2015, background): “Some forest birds receive up to 98% of their resources from aquatic prey (Nakano and Murakami, 2001).”
Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones (2005, background): “For example, in Horonai Stream in northern Japan, terrestrial invertebrates in salmonid diets fell from >70% in summer to only 1% during winter (Kawaguchi & Nakano, 2001; Nakano & Murakami, 2001).”
The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat: An Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species throughout Mainland Africa (2011, background): “Changes to riparian zones or river banks disrupt food webs and the reciprocal transfers of energy and nutrients between terrestrial and aquatic habitats (Nakano and Murakami 2001; Fausch et al. 2010).”
Production and fate of kelp detritus (2012, positive): “Subsidies can be reciprocal (Nakano & Murakami 2001); for example, when imported kelp detritus is processed and nutrients are returned to the source kelp bed or forest (Gravel et al. 2010).”
The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen‐transport networks in a boreal pine forest (2011, background): “To achieve completeness when describing interactions between organisms in an ecosystem, exploring linkages between temporally adjacent networks is just as important as exploring linkages between spatially contiguous networks (e.g. Nakano & Murakami, 2001; Knight et al., 2005).”
Length–mass relationships for adult aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates in a California watershed (2002, background): “…aquatic insects may be important energy conduits between streams and adjacent riparian habitats (Jackson and Fisher 1986, Gray 1989, Sabo 2000, Nakano and Murakami 2001, Sabo and Power 2002), the paucity of published length–mass relationships for many insect groups may prohibit studies of…”
Flow Management for Hydropower Extirpates Aquatic Insects, Undermining River Food Webs (2016, background): “We selected aquatic insects for our investigation of hydropeaking impacts, because they are ubiquitous in freshwaters and represent the primary prey for myriad species of fish, birds, bats, and other wildlife living in and along rivers (Nakano and Murakami 2001, Baxter et al.”
Linking stream habitats and spider distribution: spatial variations in trophic transfer across a forest–stream boundary (2007, background): “…in cool–temperate riparian deciduous forests, the aquatic prey contribution to the diets of riparian predators (e.g., birds and spiders) decreases from spring to summer, as aquatic insect flux decreases and terrestrial arthropod production increases (Nakano and Murakami 2001; Kato et al. 2003).”
Spatial hierarchical approach in community ecology: a way beyond high context-dependency and low predictability in local phenomena (2004, background): “In addition, the dynamics of food webs are often strongly influenced by external factors, such as allochthonous input and spatial subsidy, especially at small spatiotemporal scales (e.g., Polis et al. 1997; Nakano and Murakami 2001).”
How important are terrestrial organic carbon inputs for secondary production in freshwater ecosystems (2017, background): “…that terrestrial invertebrates (e.g., grasshoppers, ants, beetles and cicadas) are important prey for some fish species (especially salmonids and centracids) in small streams and the littoral regions of some lakes (Elliott, 1970; Francis & Schindler, 2009; Nakano & Murakami, 2001; Wipfli, 1997).”
Prey use by web-building spiders: stable isotope analyses of trophic flow at a forest-stream ecotone (2004, background): “Moreover, recent studies have recognized increasingly that carbon outputs from streams via a biological vector (e.g. emerging aquatic insects) often fuel the production of riparian generalist predators (Power & Rainey 2000; Nakano & Murakami 2001; Iwata et al. 2003).”
Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities (2004, background): “Most webs occur in a spatial context with potentially critical dynamic linkages across systems (Holt 1996, 2002; Polis & Hurd 1996; Menge et al. 1997; Polis et al. 1997; Menge 2000; Nankano & Murakami 2001; Finlay et al. 2003; Sabo & Power 2003a,b).”
Warming, eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (2012, background): “In temperate zones where our experiment was conducted, many terrestrial consumers time migration and reproductive activity to take advantage of the spring emergence of aquatic insects when terrestrial prey is otherwise scarce (Nakano & Murakami, 2001; Uesugi & Murakami, 2007; Epanchin et al., 2010).”
Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes (2002, background): “” 2002 Blackwell Science Ltd, Freshwater Biology, 47, 679‐694 Japanese stream by Nakano & Murakami (2001) .”
Terrestrial Invertebrates in the Riparian Zone: Mechanisms Underlying Their Unique Diversity (2017, background): “Unique and spatially restricted food resources, such as emergent aquatic insects, are generally at peak abundance in spring and early summer (Nakano and Murakami 2001).”
Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems (2002, background): “ISSN 0030-1299 (Nakano and Murakami 2001); marine carrion and detritus that washes up on small islands provides the trophic base for terrestrial consumers which control the community structure and species composition of islands in the Gulf of California (Polis et al. 1998); and daily foraging…”
Artificial Light at Night Affects Organism Flux across Ecosystem Boundaries and Drives Community Structure in the Recipient Ecosystem (2017, background): “Aquatic-terrestrial subsidy fluxes can be reciprocal, benefitting consumers in both habitats (Polis et al., 1997; Nakano and Murakami, 2001; Richardson et al., 2010) while also contributing to food-web and ecosystem stability (Takimoto et al., 2002).”
Nutrient exchanges between marine and terrestrial ecosystems: the case of the Galapagos sea lion Zalophus wollebaecki (2003, background): “Recently, Nakano & Murakami (2001) demonstrated that cross-ecosystem linkages are highly variable in time and space and proposed that to improve our knowledge of these processes, a more complete perspective of study is needed.”