Warming, eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The three Rs of river ecosystem resilience: Resources, recruitment, and refugia (2019, background): “, 2013; Richardson & Sato, 2015) and indirect effects through subsidies between ecosystem compartments and community functional groups (Greig et al., 2012).”
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research (2013, background): “…in the United Kingdom (Liverpool: Feuchtmayr et al., 2010; McKee et al., 2003; Moran et al., 2010; Moss et al., 2003 and Dorset: YvonDurocher et al., 2010a,b, 2011a,b), Denmark (Jeppesen et al., 2010a,b; Liboriussen et al., 2005, 2011), and Canada (e.g. Greig et al., 2012; Kratina et al., 2012).”
Land-use effects on terrestrial consumers through changed size structure of aquatic insects (2015, background): “ence the importance of such linkages (Marczak, Thompson & Richardson, 2007; Davis, Rosemond & Small, 2011; Marcarelli et al., 2011; Greig et al., 2012).”
Amphibian Contributions to Ecosystem Services (2014, background): “The magnitude of this export can vary with factors such as temperature (Greig et al. 2012), canopy cover (Earl et al. 2011), allochthonous inputs (Earl and Semlitsch 2012), hydroperiod (Schriever et al. 2013), and species composition (Greig et al. 2012; Luhring 2013; Schriever et al. 2013).”