Globalisation and Unequalisation: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis?

By Raphael Kaplinsky. 2000

1,098 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f458f578ee7fc83f658e079ed353fee66cfe407

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Governing the coffee chain: The role of voluntary regulatory Systems (2005, background): “Kaplinsky and Fitter (2004) have called this strategy ‘‘the systematic application of knowledge in the value chain,’’ and describe the example of strong coordination between Illy and its suppliers, who also reap economic benefits from the higher prices commanded by Illy’s roasted coffee (larger inco”
An integrative typology of global strategy and global value chains: The management and organization of cross‐border activities (2020, background): “Building on the premise that GVC participation may not always bring equal prosperity and value to all stakeholders (see, among others, Kaplinsky, 2000; Ponte & Ewert, 2009; Werner & Bair, 2019), this theme examines strategies and factors that can redress such imbalances in order to make GVC…”
Stretching Global Production Networks: The International Second-hand Clothing Trade (2013, background): “Kaplinsky (2000) has argued (from the Global Value Chains (GVC) position) for studies which attempt to explain how global industries are organised and governed, which extend beyond commodities‟ first life cycles.”
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development (2002, neutral): “See also Clancy (1998); Dolan and Humphrey (2000); Bonacich and Appelbaum (2000) and Kaplinsky (2000) among others.”
Trade Liberalization and Poverty: A Handbook (2002, background): “Kaplinsky (2000) describes how value chain analysis can be used in the study of”
Innovation Trajectories in Developing Countries: Co-evolution of Global Value Chains and Innovation Systems (2018, neutral): “GVC trade accounts for more than 60 per cent of global trade in value-added terms, reflecting the unceasing importance of this phenomenon (World Bank, 2017)(2), which has attracted much attention among development economists and sociologists (Gereffi and Korzeniewic, 1994; Kaplinsky, 2000) and, more”
A Policy Agenda for Pro-Poor Agricultural Growth (2004, background): “Kaplinsky, 2000, uses value chain analysis to make a more general argument that for suppliers of goods and services the long run benefits of globalisation are concentrated in intellectual property rights, knowledge and governance, where barriers to entry allow firms to retain rents in otherwise…”
Political Contestation in Global Production Networks (2008, background): “Kaplinsky (2000) discusses three forms of chain governance, legislative (rule setting), judicial (rule enforcement) and executive (corporate management).”
Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India (2018, background): “In the context of developing countries the focus of such forms of experimentation (Fejerskov, 2017) has included the global value chain (Kaplinsky, 2000) and the potential for innovation to open up underexploited markets e.g. by multinational corporations (MNCs) (Prahalad, 2010) or, in contrast,…”
Do Global Value Chains Enhance Economic Upgrading? A Long View (2020, background): “More qualitative studies on GVCs are in general critical about the opportunities for upgrading through GVC participation in the long run (Barrientos, Knorringa, Evers, Visser, & Opondo, 2016; Gereffi, 1994; Kaplinsky, 2000).”
Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalization: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda (2010, background): “They have then tried to upgrade their L advantages to encourage MNEs both to deepen and to broaden their local value-adding activities (e.g. Wade, 1990; Kaplinsky, 2000; Henderson et al., 2002; Giroud, 2003; Lorentzen, 2005; Giuliani et al., 2005; Rasiah, 2006; Morris & Barnes 2008).”
Value chains, neoliberalism and development practice: The Indonesian experience (2014, background): “While the benefits of such ‘joined-up policies’ (Kaplinsky, 2000) are clearly important, it is also prudent to recognize both the conceptual and political space for the incursion of ‘value chain’ approaches that had been created due to intellectual turmoil within development theory and practice over”
Upgrading in Clusters and Value Chains in Latin America: The Role of Policies (2004, background): “According to Kaplinsky (2000) and Wood (2001), the value chain perspective is analytically useful for three main reasons.”
Global Commodity Chains and the Marxian Law of Value (2010, background): “Second, the kind of quantitative evidence generally provided based on share of value added in each node of the chain (cf Kaplinsky 2000) is not a meaningful measure of each individual capital’s valorisation capacity (ie their profitability), and falls into the mislabelling of the rate of profit…”