Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growths

By Ning Ding, B. Field. Land Economics, 2005

481 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2eff3f0c1a2d74b8f488f59dc41871157faddfcb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. G. Hilson
2. R. Maconachie
3. Kweku Adams
4. Dawda Adams
5. Steinar Holden
6. Tobias Kronenberg
7. S. Ullah
8. Tomáš Havránek

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Nanthakumar Loganathan
2. G. Hilson
3. Muhammad Shahbaz
4. Tomáš Havránek
5. R. Horvath
6. Samir Saidi
7. A. Zeynalov
8. R. Maconachie

Citations in the corpus

• The Curse Of Natural Resources In The Transition Economies (2003, background): “Sachs and Warner (1995) examine a sample of 97 developing countries from 1970 to 1989 and find a significant negative correlation between GDP growth and the ratio of natural resource exports to GDP. Gylfason (2001) finds a negative relationship between the share of natural capital in total capital…”
• Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socio-economic growth of oil-rich developing countries (2019, background): “Whilst Sachs and Warner (1995) find no relationship between institutional quality and natural resource-curse, Mehlum et al. (2006) claim that natural resources abundant countries form both growth losers and growth winners.”
• The resource curse revisited and revised (2006, unknown): “[16] also consider the endogeneity of resource dependence.”
• “GOOD GOVERNANCE” AND THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (2008, background): “At the heart of most resource curse critiques are the seminal studies of Sachs and Warner (1995, 1997), who were among the first to argue, based on empirical findings, that developing countries with high ratios of natural resource exports to GDP tend to experience low economic growth.”
• The role of country-level institutional factors in escaping the natural resource curse: Insights from Ghana (2019, background): “This phenomenon is hypothesised that resource-rich developing countries tend to grow more slowly than their less resourced counterparts (Sachs and Warner, 1995, 1997, 2001; Humphreys et al., 2007).”
• Empirical evidence on the resource curse hypothesis in oil abundant economy (2014, background): “History of economic development reveals that growing economies who relied heavily on the abundance of their natural resources for economic development fail to achieve the economic prosperity (Sachs and Warner, 1995).”
• The curse of natural resources: An empirical investigation of U.S. counties § (2011, unknown): “                                                             2 Examples of studies that find empirical support for the resource curse include Ding and Field (2005) and Bulte et al. (2005).”
• Avoiding the resource curse the case Norway (2013, background): “The literature on “the resource curse” shows a bleak relationship: countries with large natural resources generally experience lower economic growth than other countries (see e.g. Sachs and Warner, 1995, and Mehlum, Moene and Torvik, 2006).”
• Natural Resources and Economic Growth : A Meta-Analysis (2016, background): “…& Warner, 1995; Leite & Weidmann, 1999; Tella & Ades, 1999; Lederman & Maloney, 2003; Boschini et al., 2007; Sala-i-Martin & Subramanian, 2013; Ding & Field, 2005; Mehlum et al., 2006; Brunnschweiler & Bulte, 2008; Arezki & van der Ploeg, 2007). van der Ploeg (2011) notes that the application…”