High-resolution simulations of the final assembly of Earth-like planets I. Terrestrial accretion and dynamics

By S. Raymond, Thomas R. Quinn, J. I. L. D. O. Astronomy, U. Washington, Seattle, Current address at Lasp, U. Colorado, Boulder, Lunar, Planetary Laboratory and 1 more. 2005

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The final stage in the formation of terrestrial planets consists of the accumulation of ∼1000-km “planetary embryos” and a swarm of billions of 1–10 km “planetesimals.” During this process, water-rich material is accreted by the terrestrial planets via impacts of water-rich bodies from beyond roughly 2.5 AU. We present results from five high-resolution dynamical simulations. These start from 1000–2000 embryos and planetesimals, roughly 5–10 times more particles than in previous simulations. Each simulation formed 2–4 terrestrial planets with masses between 0.4 and 2.6 Earth masses. The eccentricities of most planets were ∼0.05, lower than in previous simulations, but still higher than for Venus, Earth and Mars. Each planet accreted at least the Earth's current water budget. We demonstrate several new aspects of the accretion process: (1) The feeding zones of terrestrial planets change in time, widening and moving outward. Even in the presence of Jupiter, water-rich material from beyond 2.5 AU is not accreted for several millions of years. (2) Even in the absence of secular resonances, the asteroid belt is cleared of >99% of its original mass by self-scattering of bodies into resonances with Jupiter. (3) If planetary embryos form relatively slowly, then the formation of embryos in the asteroid belt may have been stunted by the presence of Jupiter. (4) Self-interacting planetesimals feel dynamical friction from other small bodies, which has important effects on the eccentricity evolution and outcome of a simulation.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ef7905c3d27353fbdd3ef5df0cb0897a3e069ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Morbidelli
  2. S. Raymond
  3. Anders Johansen
  4. Michiel Lambrechts
  5. D. Nesvorný
  6. N. Madhusudhan
  7. A. Izidoro
  8. M. Perryman

Citations in the corpus