A Decreased Probability of Habitable Planet Formation around Low-Mass Stars

By S. Raymond, J. Scalo, V. Meadows. 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Smaller terrestrial planets (≲0.3 M⊕) are less likely to retain the substantial atmospheres and ongoing tectonic activity probably required to support life. A key element in determining whether sufficiently massive sustainably habitable planets can form is the availability of solid planet-forming material. We use dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation from planetary embryos and simple scaling arguments to explore the implications of correlations between terrestrial planet mass, disk mass, and the mass of the parent star. We assume that the protoplanetary disk mass scales with stellar mass as Mdisk ∝ fM, where f measures the relative disk mass and 1/2 < h < 2, so that disk mass decreases with decreasing stellar mass. We consider systems without Jovian planets, based on current models and observations for M stars. We assume the mass of a planet formed in some annulus of a disk with given parameters is proportional to the disk mass in that annulus and show with a suite of simulations of late-stage accretion that the adopted prescription is surprisingly accurate. Our results suggest that the fraction of systems with sufficient disk mass to form >0.3 M⊕ habitable planets decreases for low-mass stars for every realistic combination of parameters. This habitable fraction is small for stellar masses below a mass in the interval 0.5-0.8 M☉, depending on disk parameters, an interval that excludes most M stars. Radial mixing and therefore water delivery are inefficient in the lower mass disks commonly found around low-mass stars, such that terrestrial planets in the habitable zones of most low-mass stars are likely to be small and dry.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36682c39e47efb28d1e31dba43d3c4b29a376c76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Charbonneau
  2. L. Kaltenegger
  3. J. Johnson
  4. E. Wolf
  5. M. Perryman
  6. Jon Fortney
  7. A. Reiners
  8. D. Fabrycky

Citations in the corpus