Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants
By Professor Dreux de Nettancourt. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000
758 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2edbe32640e3a67c0d5e27359ed25dae2933ed12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Self-incompatibility in plants. (2005, background): “duced, those carrying two different S-haplotypes (heteroallelic pollen), but not two of the same S-haplotypes (homoallelic pollen), fail to function in SI, although the molecular mechanism of the breakdown is unknown (6, 9).”
- The Beginning of a New Invasive Plant: A History of the Ornamental Callery Pear in the United States (2007, background): “In this system, pollen tubes begin to grow down the styles of both compatible and incompatible mates, but if the haploid pollen grain shares the same self-incompatibility allele as the diploid maternal tissue, the pollen tube is prevented from reaching the ovule (de Nettancourt 2001).”
- Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro (2010, background): “Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically controlled mechanism that prevents selffertilization in fertile hermaphroditic plants when they are selfed or crossed to another plant with an identical incompatibility phenotype (de Nettancourt 2001).”
- Pollination control technologies for hybrid breeding (2011, neutral): “A diverse array of SI mechanisms has been identified (de Nettancourt 2001; Kaothien-Nakayama et al. 2010).”