Self-incompatibility in plants.

By S. Takayama, A. Isogai. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2005

697 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus (2011, neutral): “This is, for instance, the case of sporophytic SI of Brasicaceae, GSI of Papaveraceae, or even of GSI of Prunus which is also based on the S-RNase system (Takayama and Isogai, 2005).”
Mechanical Principles Governing Pollen Tube Growth (2007, background): “The questions that arise concern in particular recognition mechanisms occurring during cross- and auto-incompatibility reactions (recently reviewed by Silva and Goring 2001; Takayama and Isogai 2004) and guidance mechanisms allowing the pollen tube to find its way within a compatible pistil (recentl”
Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences (2008, background): “In the Solanaceae, a family of some 2600 species, of which ca. 40% are SI (Whalen and Anderson 1981; Igic et al. 2006), widespread shared ancestral polymorphism at the S-locus implies an uninterrupted ancestry of SI for all species from which S-alleles have been sampled (for a more complete discussi”